Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 10;115(12):2286–2294. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.10.032

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Best reconstructed GEM for GAM data of mouse chromosome 19 at 30 kbp resolution (21). (A) A comparison between experimental (lower left) and GEM (upper right) contact probabilities. (B) A comparison of experimental and GEM contact probabilities (2D histogram). We give the Pearson correlation coefficient. (C) A comparison of the average contact probability as a function of the contour length. To see this figure in color, go online.