Table 2.
Younger controls (n = 24) | Age-matched controls (n = 16) | LVT− (n = 36) | LVT+ (n = 32) | P-valuea | P-valueb | P-valuec | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Volumetric assessment | |||||||
Anterior infarction (n) | 22 | 28 | 0.01 | ||||
Infarct size (% of LV) | 21 ± 14 | 24 ± 12 | 0.6 | ||||
Apical RWMA score | 3 ± 1 | 4 ± 0.5 | 0.055 | ||||
Stroke volume (mL) | 105 ± 30 | 93 ± 28 | 77 ± 26 | 75 ± 31 | <0.01 | 0.06 | 0.42 |
Ejection fraction (%) | 62 ± 7 | 64 ± 5 | 44 ± 11 | 32 ± 17 | 0.13 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
LVEDVi (mL/m2) | 91 ± 19 | 75 ± 21 | 91 ± 16 | 100 ± 43 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 |
LVESVi (mL/m2) | 35 ± 11 | 27 ± 6 | 52 ± 15 | 67 ± 41 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
LVMi (g/m2) | 52 ± 15 | 49 ± 9 | 56 ± 13 | 68 ± 21 | 0.44 | 0.03 | <0.01 |
Haemodynamic assessment | |||||||
E-wave velocity (cm/s)d | 59 ± 44 | 48 ± 22 | 26 ± 9 | 27 ± 10 | 0.08 | <0.01 | 0.66 |
A-wave velocity (cm/s)d | 32 ± 19 | 34 ± 13 | 24 ± 8 | 24 ± 8 | 0.65 | <0.01 | 0.21 |
E/A ratio | 2 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 1.2 ± 0.8 | 0.09 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
MDT (ms) | 147 ± 35 | 140 ± 26 | 146 ± 30 | 137 ± 42 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.81 |
Mitral regurgitation (mL) | 0 ± 0.01 | 0 ± 0.02 | 3 ± 4 | 4 ± 3 | 0.33 | 0.01 | 0.09 |
Data are presented as median ± interquartile range or count (n). LV measurements are indexed to body surface area.
LVEDVi, left ventricular end-diastolic volume (indexed); LVESVi, left ventricular end-systolic volume (indexed); LVMi, left ventricular mass (indexed); MDT, mitral deceleration time; MV, mitral valve; RWMA, regional-wall motion abnormality score (1 = normal, 2 = hypokinaesia, 3 = akinetic, 4 = diskinetic).
Younger controls vs. older age-matched to patient controls.
Age-matched controls vs. LVT−.
LVT− vs. LVT+.
These peak inflow velocities are average peak velocities for the full mitral annular flow.