Table 2.
Differences in risk and protective factor measures by AUDIT categories and illicit drug use
| Hazardous Drinkers N = 434 |
Lower-risk Drinkers N = 382 |
Non-drinkers N = 1111 |
p-value* | Illicit drug use N = 324 |
No illicit drug use N = 1561 |
p-value* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) or N (%) | Mean (SD) or N (%) | Mean (SD) or N (%) | Mean (SD) or N (%) | Mean (SD) or N (%) | Mean (SD) or N (%) | |||
| Models Risk | ||||||||
| Sibling drinks alcohol | 906 (47.4%) | 259 (60.3%) | 183 (48.3%) | 463 (42.1%) | < 0.001 | 182 (57.1%) | 709 (45.7%) | < 0.001 |
| Problem drinker at home | 680 (36.2%) | 199 (47.3%) | 141 (37.9%) | 339 (31.3%) | <.0.001 | 154 (49.4%) | 516 (33.8%) | < 0.001 |
| Peer models risk (2 items) | 0 (0.73) | 0.43 (0.80) | −0.01 (0.72) | −0.16 (0.64) | < 0.001 | 0.35 (0.87) | −0.07 (0.68) | < 0.001 |
| Vulnerability Risks | ||||||||
| Individual vulnerability risk (8 items) | −0.01 (0.58) | 0.28 (0.67) | 0.01 (0.54) | −0.13 (0.52) | < 0.001 | 0.36 (0.66) | −0.08 (0.53) | < 0.001 |
| Social vulnerability risk (3 items) | 0 (0.77) | 0.33 (0.76) | 0.03 (0.75) | −0.14 (0.74) | < 0.001 | 0.38 (0.78) | −0.07 (0.75) | < 0.001 |
| Suicidal ideation (SI) in past year | 381 (20.1%) | 152 (36.3%) | 75 (20.1%) | 154 (14.0%) | < 0.001 | 118 (38.7%) | 252 (16.3%) | < 0.001 |
| Opportunity risk (4 items) | 0 (0.72) | 0.67 (0.93) | −0.02 (0.68) | −0.26(0.41) | < 0.001 | 0.67 (0.99) | −0.14 (0.55) | < 0.001 |
| Alcohol availability at home | 0 (1) | 0.45 (1.39) | 0.06 (1.11) | −0.20 (0.65) | < 0.001 | 0.49 (1.44) | −0.10 (0.84) | < 0.001 |
| Alcohol availability at social gatherings (3 items) | 0 (0.81) | 0.88 (1.07) | −0.10 (0.58) | −0.31 (0.41) | < 0.001 | 0.85 (1.10) | −0.18 (0.60) | < 0.001 |
| Support protection (6 items) | 0 (0.55) | −0.09 (0.56) | −0.03 (0.55) | 0.05 (0.54) | −0.15 (0.58) | 0.03 (0.54) | < 0.001 | |
| Parental support (4 items) | 0 (0.68) | −0.19 (0.69) | −0.09 (0.67) | 0.10 (0.65) | < 0.001 | −0.24 (0.68) | 0.05 (0.66) | < 0.001 |
| Controls protection | ||||||||
| Individual controls protection (3 items) | 0 (0.77) | −0.32 (0.96) | − 0.03 (0.75) | 0.13 (0.65) | < 0.001 | − 0.42 (0.94) | 0.09 (0.68) | < 0.001 |
| Social control protection (9 items) | 0 (0.57) | −0.37 (0.60) | −0.04 (0.55) | 0.16 (0.49) | < 0.001 | −0.47 (0.59) | 0.10 (0.51) | < 0.001 |
| Models protection (4 items) | 0 (0.62) | −0.19 (0.65) | −0.04 (0.60) | 0.09 (0.59) | < 0.001 | −0.22 (0.64) | 0.04 (0.60) | < 0.001 |
Hazard drinking = AUDIT score “5+”, Low Risk Drinking is AUDIT scores “1,2,3,4”; Non-drinkers is AUDIT score “0”
*Significance of differences between group analyzed using univariate ordinal multinomial cumulative logit analysis using GEE methods to adjusted for clustering by school
**Significance of differences between group analyzed using univariate binomial logit analysis using GEE methods to adjusted for clustering by school
Risk Factor Measures: standardize scores where the mean = 0 and standard deviation =1, higher scores are worse. Protective Factor Measure: standardize scale where mean = 0, standard deviation = 1, higher scores are better