Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 20;6:62. doi: 10.1186/s40359-018-0270-z

Table 6.

Summary of reward relationships within the SEM models for taking vitamin C tablets

Potential reward type Pathway Time 1, b Time 2, b Time 3, b Time 4, b
Pleasure Mediated
 Reward-Behaviour .215 .345* −.066 −.116
 Behaviour Automaticity .175* .148* .300*** .110
Moderated .048 .096* .073* .062
Intrinsic motivation Mediated
 Reward-Behaviour .208 .120 .039 −.112
 Behaviour-Automaticity .184* .167** .280*** .123
Moderated .066* .056* .028 .001
Perceived utility Mediated
 Reward-Behaviour .323 −.177
R-I :
.833***
I-B: .267**
.074 −.147
Behaviour-Automaticity .201** .168** .269*** .086
Moderated .086 .033 .059 .004
Perceived benefit Mediated
 Reward-Behaviour −.410 −.234
 Behaviour-Automaticity .205** - - .088
Moderated .103 .037

Note: for vitamin C, the intervention took place at T0

Significant mediated effects are only represented in the coefficients marked in bold, where more than one significant coefficient makes a complete significant pathway between reward to automaticity. (Items in italics reflect a mediation relationship from reward to automaticity that is via both via intention and behaviour, rather than just via behaviour. The coefficients from reward to intention are marked R-I, and the coefficients from intention to behaviour are marked I-B). Perceived benefit was not measured at Time 2 or Time 3

* p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p ≤ .001