Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 1;75(Pt 1):82–93. doi: 10.1107/S2053273318013918

Table 3. Model building and refinement statistics after unconstrained refinement of hydrogen atoms.

  IRELOH EPICZA
Space group P212121 P212121
Unit-cell dimensions    
a, b, c (Å) 8.015 (2), 10.015 (2), 17.703 (4) 10.996 (2), 12.452 (2), 13.218 (3)
α, β, γ (°) 90.00, 90.00, 90.00 90.00, 90.00, 90.00
Parameters 245 305
Restraints 156 267
Reflections 6096 12039
Unique 1332 1761
     
Refinement    
R1 (%)§ 15.7 (13.9) 16.6 (14.7)
R complete (%) 19.9 21.5
w R2 (%) 34.6 37.1
GooF 1.031 1.051
R.m.s.d. bond lengths (Å) 0.024 (18) 0.030 (20)
R.m.s.d. hydrogen-bond lengths (Å) 0.180 (72) 0.259 (80)
     
Dynamical corrections    
R1 (%)§ 12.5 (11.5) 12.2 (11.4)
R complete (%) 15.2 14.5
w R2 (%) 28.1 28.0
GooF 0.907 0.851
R.m.s.d. bond lengths (Å) 0.022 (13) 0.026 (13)
R.m.s.d. hydrogen-bond lengths (Å) 0.073 (52) 0.110 (56)

New unit-cell dimensions after lattice refinement, see also Tables S9 and S10 in the supporting information.

Enhanced rigid-bond restraints (RIGU) were applied for refinement in SHELXL (Thorn et al., 2012).

§

Inline graphic = Inline graphicInline graphic where the sum is over all reflections, values in parentheses show R1 for reflections Inline graphic.

R complete was calculated over all reflections with a 0.2% test set size as a robust and unbiased validation tool (Luebben & Gruene, 2015); since all data are included, R work is equivalent to R1.

††

R.m.s.d. for all non-hydrogen atoms, calculated against reference values from high-resolution X-ray models (Dai et al., 2010; Deffieu et al., 1977).

‡‡

R.m.s.d. for the idealized hydrogen-bond lengths after unconstrained refinement of the hydrogen positions (Gruene et al., 2014; Sheldrick, 2015a ); see also Tables S6 and S8 in the supporting information.