Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2018 Dec 21;13(12):e0209268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209268

Haplotypes in the CYP2R1 gene are associated with levels of 25(OH)D and bone mineral density, but not with other markers of bone metabolism (MrOS Sweden)

Anne Björk 1,*, Dan Mellström 2, Claes Ohlsson 3, Magnus Karlsson 4, Hans Mallmin 5, Gunnar Johansson 6, Östen Ljunggren 1, Andreas Kindmark 1
Editor: Sakamuri V Reddy7
PMCID: PMC6303094  PMID: 30576350

Abstract

Objective

Polymorphisms in the CYP2R1 gene encoding Vitamin D 25-hydroxylase have been reported to correlate with circulating levels of 25-OH vitamin D3 (25(OH)D). It is unknown whether these variations also affect overall bone metabolism. In order to elucidate the overall associations of polymorphisms in the CYP2R1, we studied haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the gene and serum levels of 25(OH)D, calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23), as well as bone mineral density (BMD).

Methods

Baseline data on serum parameters and BMD from MrOS Sweden, a prospective population-based cohort study of elderly men (mean age 75 years, range 69–81), were analyzed. Genotyping was performed for eight SNPs covering the CYP2R1 gene in 2868 men with available samples of DNA. Subjects were followed up concerning incidence of fracture during five years.

Results

There was a significant genetic association with circulating levels of 25(OH)D (4.6–18.5% difference in mean values between SNP alleles), but there were no correlations with levels of calcium, phosphate, PTH or FGF23 for any genetic variant. No differences were found in fracture incidence between the variants. There was an inverse relationship between lower BMD and concomitant higher 25(OH)D for three of the haplotypes (p < 0.005).

Conclusions

Common variants in the CYP2R1 gene encoding Vitamin D 25-hydroxylase correlate with levels of circulating 25(OH)D but do not otherwise associate with measures of calcium and phosphate homeostasis. Presence of the specific haplotypes may be an indicator of risk for low 25(OH)D levels, and may in addition be correlated to bone mineral density.

Introduction

The increasing incidence of osteoporosis-related fractures with increasing age is a major health problem, leading to suffering and increased mortality, as well as economic problems for both the individual and society [1, 2]. Osteoporosis is characterised by low bone mineral density (BMD), and bone micro architectural deterioration. Both environmental and hereditary factors have been shown be important and to interact, for BMD as well as for fractures [35].

Twin and family-based osteoporosis studies have indicated that as much as 60 to 85% of the variance in BMD is genetically determined [6], and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), associated with low BMD, osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures [7].

Calcium (Ca), phosphate (P), and vitamin D are all essential for bone metabolism and the maintenance of the strength and function of the skeleton. The role of vitamin D, in this context, is to participate in the regulation of Ca homeostasis. Thus, the active metabolite of vitamin D stimulates calcium absorption from the gut. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) acts on the skeleton by enhancing the release of calcium from the bones. It also regulates renal calcium handling. By stimulating the conversion of 25(OH)D into the active form 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, PTH also causes an enhanced absorption of calcium in the intestine. Another important phosphate regulating factor participating in bone and mineral metabolism is the fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) which in turn is regulated by levels of phosphate and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [8, 9]. Vitamin D deficiency can lead to musculoskeletal diseases such as rickets and osteomalacia, but vitamin D supplementation may also prevent extra skeletal diseases such as respiratory tract infections, asthma exacerbations, pregnancy complications and premature deaths. [10]

Vitamin D deficiency leads to a decrease in intestinal calcium absorption and ultimately to a transient decrease in ionized calcium. The 25(OH)D-concentration in blood is regarded as the best measure of an individual’s overall vitamin D status [11].

The diet may contain vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) or vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), the latter mainly in fish, dairy products or additions to margarine or milk. Most supplements contain cholecalciferol. Ergocalciferol is generated in some foods (mushrooms) by UV radiation. Whether produced in the body from the diet (mainly in fish, dairy products, additions to margarine or milk and supplements) or dermal synthesis from sunlight containing UVB, vitamin D is initially biologically inactive, and activation requires enzymatic conversion (hydroxylation) in the liver and kidney. The enzyme vitamin D 25-hydroxylase, encoded by the CYP2R1 gene, has been shown to be a key enzyme for the conversion in the liver of cholecalciferol into the form (calcidiol) [12]. Variants near the CYP2R1 gene have also been shown to influence circulating levels of 25(OH)D, and genome-wide significance for association between levels of the vitamin has been shown for one of the CYP2R1 SNPs; rs10741657 [13]. A Danish study has also shown that common polymorphisms in the vitamin D binding protein (VDBP encoded by the gene GC) and CYP2R1 are associated with 25(OH)D concentrations in the Caucasian population and that certain haplotypes may predispose to lower 25(OH)D concentrations in late summer in Denmark [14].

Genetic variation is in turn also believed to explain 79.4% of the variation of levels of the VDBP, but only 9.9% of the variation in 25(OH)D levels [15]. Several studies indicate that allelic variation in CYP2R1 (rs10741657) affects vitamin D levels [1618].

It is not clear how other biochemical markers and BMD are associated with polymorphisms in the CYP2R1 gene. Apart from a study of postmenopausal Chinese women which showed no significant association between 10766197 and BMD, no genetic association studies analyzing the CYP2R1 gene and BMD have been published [19].

The aims of the present study were to investigate the relationship between polymorphisms and haplotypes in the CYP2R1 gene and levels of 25(OH)D, as well as other biochemical parameters (PTH, Ca, P and FGF23) of calcium homeostasis. In addition, possible associations between genetic variation in CYP2R1 with BMD of the hip, lumbar spine and femoral neck as well as fracture incidence during the five years following baseline were investigated.

Materials and methods

Subjects

The MrOS study is a multi-center, prospective cohort study of elderly men in Sweden, Hong Kong and the USA [20]. The present study used data from the Swedish part of MrOS (n = 3014), recruited at medical centers in Uppsala (n = 999), Gothenburg (n = 1010) and Malmö (n = 1005). Men aged 69–81 years were randomly identified using national population registers. To be eligible for the study, participants had to be able to walk without aids, provide self-reported data and give signed informed consent. There were no other exclusion criteria. The participation rate in MrOS Sweden was 45%. In the present report, the baseline data in MrOS Sweden were used for biochemical markers and BMD measurements. Fracture data available after 5 years from baseline were analyzed. Diabetes incidence was estimated from a health questionnaire at baseline., The diagnoses were not validated by searching in the charts.

Informed consent was obtained for all subjects and the study was approved by the l The Regional Ethical Review Board in Lund, (Dnr LU 693–00), the Central Ethical Review Board at Gothenburg university (Dnr Gbg M 014–01) and the Regional Ethical Review Board in Uppsala (Ups 01–057). The study was performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.

Genotyping of the CYP2R1 gene

DNA was isolated from whole blood extracted at baseline from all participants where blood samples were available, in total 2870 participants. Using a saturation approach representing HapMap SNPs and HaploView scoring, a total of 11 SNPs covering 100 kb of the genetic region surrounding the CYP2R1 gene including the 3’ and 5’ untranslated regions (UTRs) were selected. Genotyping was performed using the Sequenom Mass ARRAY iPLEX Gold technology (Sequenom Inc., Newton, MA) by single base primer extension and MALDI TOF Mass Spectrometry. Successful genotyping was obtained from 8 SNPs (rs10766197, rs11023374, rs10741657, rs10832313, rs16930609, rs16930625, rs11023371 and rs7936142) with overall call rate of 97.8%. Allele frequencies were calculated and found to be in Hardy-Weinberg (HW) equilibrium in the cohort for all SNPs. Haploview software version 4.2 was used to calculate linkage disequilibrium (LD) values, generate haplotype blocks and diagrams, as well as suggesting tagging SNPs using the tagger algorithm [21]. The preselected SNPs and haplotypes computed using the Arlequine population genetic data analysis program, were analyzed for associations between vitamin D values and other biochemical parameters (calcium, phosphate, FGF-23 and PTH), as well as markers of bone mineral density (femoral neck, lumbar spine and total hip).

Serum measurements

Serum samples were collected and stored at -80°C for biochemical markers, and at -20°C for DNA analysis.

Serum 25(OH)D was measured at baseline in 2878 subjects, with a competitive RIA (Diasorin, Stillwater, MN, USA; intra-assay CV 6%, inter-assay CV 15–16%) at a single laboratory. The inter-assay CV was 15–16% at all 25(OH)D levels [22]. The laboratory used participated in DEQAS quality controls.

Phosphate, calcium and albumin were analyzed at respective hospitals department for clinical chemistry using standard methods. Albumin modified calcium was calculated with the formula calcium-(0.018(albumin-42)) [23]. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in ml/min/1.73 m2 was calculated from serum cystatin C (Cystatin C Immunoparticles, Dako A/S, Glostrup, Denmark) according to the formula 79.901*(Cyst C [mg/L])-1.4389 [24]. Intact PTH was measured by a second generation immunometric assay, Immulite 2000, (Los Angeles, USA). 25(OH)D levels were measured by Nichols Advantage automated assay system (San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA). Serum concentration of intact FGF23 was analyzed in using a two-site monoclonal antibody-based ELISA (Kainos Laboratories International; Tokyo, Japan).

BMD measurements

BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck was measured using DXA scanners: Lunar Prodigy DXA (GE Lunar Corp., Madison, WI, USA) in Malmö and Uppsala and Hologic QDR 4500/ A-Delphi (Hologic, Bedford, MA, USA) in Gothenburg. DXA measurements performed with equipment from different manufacturers were converted to a standardized BMD as previously described [2527].

Fracture data

Study participants were followed up for a mean of 5.9 years (range 4.7–7.4) after the baseline examination. They received a one-page Tri-Annual Questionnaire every four months. This instrument was used to update contact information and to ascertain the incidence of falls and fractures and back pain. Time to first fracture or death was defined as time from the baseline study date to the actual event. Fracture evaluation during follow-up was in addition done by re-evaluation of X-ray in the regional registry, identified by the probands' unique personal registration number[20, 28].

The following fractures were regarded as osteoporotic: fractures of the pelvis, vertebrae, radius and humerus.

Other measurements

Height (in centimeters) and weight (in kilograms) were measured, and BMI was calculated as kilograms per square meter.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS program version 22 and SAS version 9.4. Differences between characteristics for the different SNPs were computed by ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc testing. p<0.05 were considered significant. Values are given as mean ± SD unless otherwise stated. Probability for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), and major and minor allele frequencies were calculated using χ2 test for HW equilibrium for biallelic markers. Differences in relative fracture risk between alleles of tagging SNPs were compared by calculating chi-square. The analyses were done for osteoporotic fractures in all participants with data on genotype and fracture. No adjustments for covariates were made.

Results

Subjects

Genotyping and serum 25(OH)D concentrations were available for 2870 participants. The mean age was 75.4 years (range 69–81), and mean BMI was 26.4. Height, weight and Body Mass Index (BMI) were all normally distributed. Overall, the participants were relatively vitamin D sufficient, and the mean level of 25(OH)D was 69.8 nmol/L. Only 0.9% had vitamin D deficiency (<25 nmol/L), and 17% had vitamin D insufficiency (25–49 nmol/L). The incidence of self-reported diabetes was 9.5%.

Characteristics of the study cohort, biochemical parameters and BMD are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Description of the study cohort (N = 2870).

Characteristics Mean SD
Age (years) 75.4 3.2
Height (m) 1.75 0.07
Weight (kg) 80.8 12.1
BMI (kg/m2) 26.4 3.6
Current smokers N (%) 241 (8.4)
25(OH)D (nmol/L) 69.8 23.8
Albumin correlated calcium (mmol/L) 2.34 0.16
Phosphate (mmol/L) 1.07 0.16
PTH (pmol/L) 4.64 3.0
FGF23 (pg/mL) 48.6 37.8
Albumin (g/L) 43.1 3.6
Cystatin C (mg/L) 1.14 0.30
Estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) 72.0 20.6
Lumbar spine vertebra 1–4. standardized BMD (mg/cm2) 1142.8 202.2
Total hip, standardized BMD (mg/cm2), left hip 948.7 145.7
Femoral neck, standardized BMD (mg/cm2), left hip 840.3 132.7

Demographic data, biochemical parameters and bone mineral density at baseline.

Continuous data are shown as means with SD, and categorical data as numbers (percentages).

BMI = Body Mass Index, PTH = Parathyroid hormone, FGF23 = Fibroblast growth factor 23, GFR = Glomerular filtration rate, BMD = Bone Mineral Density.

Haplotype analysis

The eight preselected SNPs covered the regulatory region and the exonic and intronic regions of the CYP2R1 gene. Presence of the 6 most common haplotypes was found in 93.6% of the subjects (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Genetic structure of the CYP2R1 gene, with Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) plot for the eight analysed SNPs and definition of the six most common haplotypes of the CYP2R1 gene.

Fig 1

The location of each SNP is indicated on top and the number in each diamond indicates the magnitude of LD between respective pairs of SNPs. Empty squares represent perfect LD. The table below the diagram shows the SNP genotype combination defining the 6 most common haplotypes (1–6).

Laboratory markers

  1. 25 OHD: Statistical analysis with ANOVA showed significant association (p < 0.05) between on one hand each of the haplotypes 1, 2, or 6, and on the other hand 25(OH)D levels. Analysis of all homozygotes and heterozygotes for these haplotypes showed higher 25(OH)D levels for homozygotes of haplotypes 1 and 2, but significantly lower levels for homozygotes or heterozygotes which included haplotype 6 (Table 2).

  2. Other biochemical parameters: Analysis with ANOVA of the other biochemical parameters of calcium and phosphate homeostasis (PTH, Ca, FGF-23 and phosphate) showed no associations with regard to haplotype combination. (Table 2).

Table 2. Descriptive statistics: 25(OH)D-levels and BMD for the six most common haplotypes.

Haplotype N Numbers of copies of haplotype BMD (g/cm3)
25(OH)D (nmol/L) p-valuea Lumbar spine p-value Total hip p-valuea Femoral neck p-valuea
1 1636 0 71.1 (24.7) 0.001 1139.4 (200.2) 0.296 942.0 (143.1) 836.8 (131.4) 0.179
988 1 68.2 (22.6) 1145.0 (207.0) 959.5 (150.1) 0.013 846.7 (135.6)
142 2 65.6 (20.3) 1165.7 (190.2) 952.2 (141.0) 836.7 (125.6)
2 1636 0 69.4 (23.1) 0.002 1143.4 (202.4) 0.733 947.1 (144.4) 838.1 (132.0) 0.603
988 1 69.1 (23.9) 1140.0 (198.3) 949.5 (143.8) 0.762 841.6 (130.0)
142 2 74.6 (26.5) 1150.4 (216.3) 953.9 (159.4) 846.4 (146.5
3 2340 0 69.5 (23.6) 0.150 1145.1 (201.9) 0.361 950.6 (146.3) 841.7 (133.2) 0.322
412 1 71.7 (25.1) 1129.9 (205.2) 938.3 (142.6) 0.272 833.0 (130.4)
14 2 74.2 (22.6) 1142.4 (142.7) 932.9 (133.7) 808.0 (104.9)
4 2071 0 70.0 (24.1) 0.617 1145.0 (202.5) 0.038 951.7 (146.6) 842.1 (133.7) 0.142
628 1 68.9 (22.6) 1141.7 (200.2) 943.3 (142.9) 0.025 837.4 (129.4)
87 2 69.3 (25.1) 1080.6 (204.8) 905.8 (136.5) 810.8 (128.9)
5 2476 0 70.1 (23.8) 0.086 1143.8 (202.8) 0.663 948.8 (145.6) 841.1 (132.3) 0.068
278 1 67.3 (23.9) 1133.2 (197.8) 944.8 (146.7) 0.305 829.9 (136.5)
12 2 61.4 (19.9) 1163.0 (167.9) 1013.5 (135.9) 916.0 (99.3)
6 2345 0 69.2 (23.9) 0.005 1144.2 (202.9) 0.353 949.5 (145.9) 840.2 (131.9) 0.988
401 1 72.1 (23.1) 1137.2 (199.2) 944.6 (145.5) 0.783 840.7 (138.5)
20 2 82.3 (23.8) 1086.0 (165.8) 937.7 (131.5) 836.1 (112.5)

25(OH)D, 25OH vitamin D; BMD bone mineral density. Mean values and standard deviations. N = 2870.

ap-values were calculated using ANOVA.

BMD

Multiple linear regression, with outcomes lumbar spine BMD, total hip BMD, femoral neck BMD analysed separately for each of the SNPs and HAPs, adjusted for age, showed significant associations (p<0.05) for the SNPs rs11023374 with total hip BMD and rs10832313 with femoral neck BMD, haplotype 4 with lumbar spine BMD and total hip BMD, and haplotype 1 with total hip BMD. (Table 3).

Table 3. Analysis of associations between SNPs/haplotype and bone mineral density, adjusted for age.

Outcomes: lumbar spine BMD, total hip BMD, femoral neck BMD analysed separately for each of the SNPs and HAPs.

Lumbar spine BMD Total Hip BMD Femoral neck BMD
SNP / HAP Level N % p-valuea beta estimate p-valuea beta estimate p-valuea beta estimate
rs10766197 TT (ref) 518 18.53 0.9774 0.9417 0.9494
CC 898 32.12
CT 1380 49.36
rs11023374 GA (ref) 1065 37.74 0.1069 0.012 0.2538
A 1598 56.63 0.0035 -17.287756
G 159 5.63 0.7821 -3.538543
rs10741657 TT (ref) 560 19.64 0.7742 0.8243 0.9558
CC 922 32.34
CT 1369 48.02
rs10832313 TT (ref) 2440 86.59 0.8594 0.2585 0.0437
CC 16 0.57 0.0207 78.891876
CT 362 12.85 0.3768 -6.742963
rs16930609 TT (ref) 2358 82.33 0.1847 0.7073 0.8131
GG 26 0.91
GT 480 16.76
rs16930625 TT (ref) 2369 82.75 0.6178 0.876 0.9887
CC 28 0.98
CT 466 16.28
rs11023371 CC (ref) 2311 81.23 0.3371 0.2825 0.3812
CT 512 18
TT 22 0.77
rs76936142 TT (ref) 2494 87.69 0.8316 0.3868 0.1272
AA 15 0.53
TA 335 11.78
Haplotype 1 0 (ref) 1709 59.55 0.2948 0.0106 0.1594
1 1014 35.33 0.0027 17.749128
2 147 5.12 0.4204 10.401654
Haplotype 2 0 (ref) 1473 51.32 0.737 0.8108 0.6514
1 1116 38.89
2 281 9.79
Haplotype 3 0 (ref) 2429 84.63 0.3584 0.1992 0.2225
1 427 14.88
2 14 0.49
Haplotype 4 0 (ref) 2147 74.81 0.0387 0.0406 0.2069
1 654 22.79 0.7149 -3.313495 0.2457 -7.736133
2 69 2.4 0.0109 -64.322702 0.0192 -42.694266
Haplotype 5 0 (ref) 2568 89.48 0.6623 0.269 0.0569
1 290 10.1
2 12 0.42
Haplotype 6 0 (ref) 2437 84.91 0.3552 0.8161 0.9953
1 412 14.36
2 21 0.73

*P-values were calculated using multiple linear regression, adjusted for age. Type 3 p-values are displayed showing the strength of association between the outcome variable and the SNP/Hap. If Type 3 p-value was significant (<0.05), Pr>|t| are displayed to show the significance of difference to the reference level.

When subjects with self-reported diabetes (N = 274 were removed, significant associations were found between 25(OH)D and 4 of the haplotypes (1,2,3 or 6). Significant associations were still seen between haplotype 4 and BMD (lumbar spine and total hip) in non-diabetic subjects (p < 0.05).

When analysing the SNPs separately by ANOVA, six of the eight SNPs were significantly associated with circulating levels of 25(OH)D (4.6–18.5% difference in mean values between SNP genotypes), but no correlations with circulating levels of calcium, phosphate, PTH or FGF23 for any of the SNPs were found. There was a slightly higher BMD (0.07–6.5% in the lumbar spine and 5.1–6.9% in the femoral neck) for two SNPs variants (rs11023374 and rs10832313), associated with lower circulating 25(OH)D levels. Interestingly, the higher BMD of the total hip (p = 0.013) found for rs11023374 variants was associated with lower 25(OH)D levels (Fig 2). Furthermore, a higher BMD of the femoral neck (p = 0.05) was seen for the CC allele of rs10832313. For the other SNPs, no significant differences in BMD were found between SNP genotypes, but there was a clear trend for all SNPs that lower 25(OH)D levels were associated with higher BMD values (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Variation in 25(OH)D concentrations and standardized BMD (SBMD) of the lumbar spine (L1-L4), total hip and femoral neck by CYP2R1 SNPs rs11023374 and rs10832313 genotypes.

Fig 2

Similar, although not significant, patterns (i.e. low 25(OH)D levels were associated with higher BMD) were seen for all SNPs. Values are presented as mean and SEM, with overall p-values by ANOVA.

Fracture incidence

The overall incidence of osteoporotic fractures in the cohort up to five years of follow up was 438 (15.3%) (Table 4), No significant differences were found in osteoporotic fracture incidence between variants of CYP2R1 for any of the haplotypes nor SNPs.

Table 4. Incidence of osteoporotic fractures.

N = 2870.

Localisation Frequency Percent
Acetabulum 5 0.2
Radius 46 1.6
Lumbar vertebra 78 2.7
Neck of femur 80 2.8
Pubis 16 0.6
Thoracic vertebra 90 3.1
Humerus 37 1.3
Tibia 4 0.1
Thoracic spine 22 0.8
Pertrochanteric 54 1.9
Subtrochanteric 6 0.2
Total 438 15.3

Discussion

Our results show that genetic variation in six of the eight SNPs covering the CYP2R1 gene were associated to serum 25(OH)D levels but not to other markers for calcium-phosphate balance. These findings with respect to 25(OH)D levels are consistent with other studies on subjects of European ancestry [3, 13, 16], including a Danish study, showing that alleles GG/AA of the SNPS rs19741657 and rs10766197 haplotypes were related to lower 25(OH)D concentrations [14]. Our results are, however, contrary to studies of Chinese women where no significant associations were found. This could possibly be explained by gender or ethnic differences [29].

One might expect that the genetic variants associated with low vitamin D levels would be associated with elevated PTH levels, since vitamin D deficiency often causes secondary hyperparathyroidism, with elevated PTH levels. However, although CYP2R1 haplotype number 6 (GTAGCGGA) was found to be predictive of lower 25(OH)D concentrations in our study cohort, neither this haplotype nor any other variant was associated with levels of the other markers of calcium and phosphate homeostasis (Ca, PTH, FGF23 and phosphate), nor with bone mineral density. A possible explanation of this could be that these parameters are controlled by other mechanisms than only the levels of 25(OH)D. As to the other parameters of calcium and phosphate homeostasis, no previous studies have been published, according to our knowledge.

An association was seen for one SNP (rs11023374) to BMD of the hip, and similar (although not significant) trends were seen for all the other SNPs for BMD in femoral neck and lumbar spine. Intriguingly, our results show that the SNP variants associated to low 25(OH)D levels were associated with higher BMD and vice versa, the tendency seen for all SNPs. Mechanistically, it could be possible that the action is conferred on the bone cellular level with local vitamin D conversion depending on the CYP2R1 genotype, rather than an effect on circulating levels of 25(OH)D. There have been no previous reports on association between CYP2R1 genetic variants and BMD or fractures. In a study of a cohort of 342 subjects in Austria, no association between the rs10741657 SNP and 5 years follow up of fracture incidence was found [3].

A strength of our study is that the cohort is one of the largest available male study cohorts in the world, homogenous with respect to genetic background, and that a similar pattern with regard to 25(OH)D and BMD was seen for several SNPs. A weakness of the study is that although the association between CYP2R1 variants and BMD is clear, a mechanistic explanation is currently lacking. Also, in this cohort of elderly Swedish men, presence of clinical vitamin D deficiency was rare, and these results might have been different for another population, with higher incidence of low 25(OH)D levels in the blood. Furthermore, our study does not include measurements of vitamin D binding protein.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that genetic variants of the CYP2R1 gene were correlated to levels of circulating 25(OH)D, but not to calcium, phosphate, PTH, nor FGF-23. The genetic variant associated with a concomitant inverse relationship between 25(OH)D and BMD needs further investigation. Presence of the one CYP2R1haplotype (GTAGCGGA) appears to be an indicator of risk for low 25(OH)D levels, but it remains to elucidate whether there could be any risks of severe deficiency.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Associations between serum parameters for 8 different SNPs in CYP2R1, presenting p-values by ANOVA.

N = 2870. SNP = Single Nucleotide Polymorphism, PTH = Parathyroid hormone, FGF23 = Fibroblast growth factor 23, GFR = Glomerular filtration rate.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Arier Lee, Senior Biostatistician at The University of Auckland, for help and advice with performing statistical analyses.

Data Availability

The raw data underlying this study are restricted to protect participant privacy, as required by data protection acts in Sweden. Data will be made available upon request to researchers who qualify for access to confidential data by contacting the following: Regionala Etikprövningsnämnden i Göteborg, Box 401, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden, Regionala etikprövningsnämnden i Lund, Box 133, 221 00 Lund, Sweden; and Regionala Etikprövningsnämnden i Uppsala, Drottninggatan 4, 753 09 Uppsala, Sweden. A non-author point of contact to which data requests can be sent is: Lars.Jehpsson@skane.se.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by ALF (grant nr 2014/2018, Österlund (grant nr 2016), Herman Järnhardt (grant nr 2016), and The Swedish Research Council (2011-2535). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA. Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. The Lancet. 1999;353(9156):878–82. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09075-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Johnell O. The socioeconomic burden of fractures: today and in the 21st century. Am J Med. 1997;103(2a):20S–5S; discussion 5S-6S. Epub 1997/08/18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Trummer O, Schwetz V, Walter-Finell D, Lerchbaum E, Renner W, Gugatschka M, et al. Allelic determinants of vitamin d insufficiency, bone mineral density, and bone fractures. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2012;97(7):E1234–40. Epub 2012/04/27. 10.1210/jc.2011-3088 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu CT, Karasik D, Zhou Y, Hsu YH, Genant HK, Broe KE, et al. Heritability of prevalent vertebral fracture and volumetric bone mineral density and geometry at the lumbar spine in three generations of the Framingham study. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2012;27(4):954–8. Epub 2012/01/10. 10.1002/jbmr.1537 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Eisman JA. Genetics of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev. 1999;20(6):788–804. Epub 1999/12/22. 10.1210/edrv.20.6.0384 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ralston SH. Genetic determinants of osteoporosis. Current opinion in rheumatology. 2005;17(4):475–9. Epub 2005/06/16. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Urano T, Inoue S. Genetics of osteoporosis. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2014;452(2):287–93. Epub 2014/08/21. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.141 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Quarles LD. Endocrine functions of bone in mineral metabolism regulation. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(12):3820–8. 10.1172/JCI36479 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dhayat NA, Ackermann D, Pruijm M, Ponte B, Ehret G, Guessous I, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and markers of mineral metabolism in individuals with preserved renal function. Kidney international. 2016;90(3):648–57. Epub 2016/07/03. 10.1016/j.kint.2016.04.024 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pilz S, Marz W, Cashman KD, Kiely ME, Whiting SJ, Holick MF, et al. Rationale and Plan for Vitamin D Food Fortification: A Review and Guidance Paper. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2018;9:373 10.3389/fendo.2018.00373 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Holick MF. Vitamin D status: measurement, interpretation, and clinical application. Annals of epidemiology. 2009;19(2):73–8. Epub 2008/03/11. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.12.001 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cheng JB, Levine MA, Bell NH, Mangelsdorf DJ, Russell DW. Genetic evidence that the human CYP2R1 enzyme is a key vitamin D 25-hydroxylase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(20):7711–5. Epub 2004/05/07. 10.1073/pnas.0402490101 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang TJ, Zhang F, Richards JB, Kestenbaum B, van Meurs JB, Berry D, et al. Common genetic determinants of vitamin D insufficiency: a genome-wide association study. Lancet. 2010;376(9736):180–8. Epub 2010/06/15. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60588-0 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nissen J, Rasmussen LB, Ravn-Haren G, Andersen EW, Hansen B, Andersen R, et al. Common variants in CYP2R1 and GC genes predict vitamin D concentrations in healthy Danish children and adults. Plos One. 2014;9(2):e89907 10.1371/journal.pone.0089907 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Powe CE, Evans MK, Wenger J, Zonderman AB, Berg AH, Nalls M, et al. Vitamin D–Binding Protein and Vitamin D Status of Black Americans and White Americans. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;369(21):1991–2000. 10.1056/NEJMoa1306357 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Slater NA, Rager ML, Havrda DE, Harralson AF. Genetic Variation in CYP2R1 and GC Genes Associated With Vitamin D Deficiency Status. Journal of pharmacy practice. 2015. Epub 2015/06/04. 10.1177/0897190015585876 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Thacher TD, Levine MA. CYP2R1 mutations causing vitamin D-deficiency rickets. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2017;173:333–6. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.07.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ramos-Lopez E, Bruck P, Jansen T, Herwig J, Badenhoop K. CYP2R1 (vitamin D 25-hydroxylase) gene is associated with susceptibility to type 1 diabetes and vitamin D levels in Germans. Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews. 2007;23(8):631–6. Epub 2007/07/04. 10.1002/dmrr.719 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li SS, Gao LH, Zhang XY, He JW, Fu WZ, Liu YJ, et al. Genetically Low Vitamin D Levels, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone Metabolism Markers: a Mendelian Randomisation Study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33202 10.1038/srep33202 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Orwoll E, Blank JB, Barrett-Connor E, Cauley J, Cummings S, Ensrud K, et al. Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study—a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men. Contemp Clin Trials. 2005;26(5):569–85. 10.1016/j.cct.2005.05.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2005;21(2):263–5. Epub 2004/08/07. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Johansson H, Oden A, Kanis J, McCloskey E, Lorentzon M, Ljunggren O, et al. Low serum vitamin D is associated with increased mortality in elderly men: MrOS Sweden. Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2012;23(3):991–9. Epub 2011/10/20. 10.1007/s00198-011-1809-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marsell R, Mirza MA, Mallmin H, Karlsson M, Mellstrom D, Orwoll E, et al. Relation between fibroblast growth factor-23, body weight and bone mineral density in elderly men. Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2009;20(7):1167–73. 10.1007/s00198-008-0780-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Flodin M, Jonsson AS, Hansson LO, Danielsson LA, Larsson A. Evaluation of Gentian cystatin C reagent on Abbott Ci8200 and calculation of glomerular filtration rate expressed in mL/min/1.73 m(2) from the cystatin C values in mg/L. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2007;67(5):560–7. Epub 2007/09/01. 10.1080/00365510601187773 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Genant HK, Grampp S, Gluer CC, Faulkner KG, Jergas M, Engelke K, et al. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 1994;9(10):1503–14. 10.1002/jbmr.5650091002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lu Y, Fuerst T, Hui S, Genant HK. Standardization of bone mineral density at femoral neck, trochanter and Ward's triangle. Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2001;12(6):438–44. 10.1007/s001980170087 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hanson J. Standardization of proximal femur BMD measurements. International Committee for Standards in Bone Measurement. Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 1997;7(5):500–1. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mellstrom D, Johnell O, Ljunggren O, Eriksson AL, Lorentzon M, Mallmin H, et al. Free testosterone is an independent predictor of BMD and prevalent fractures in elderly men: MrOS Sweden. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2006;21(4):529–35. 10.1359/jbmr.060110 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xu W, Sun J, Wang W, Wang X, Jiang Y, Huang W, et al. Association of genetic variants of vit D binding protein (DBP/GC) and of the enzyme catalyzing its 25-hydroxylation (DCYP2R1) and serum vit D in postmenopausal women. Hormones (Athens, Greece). 2014;13(3):345–52. Epub 2014/08/01. 10.14310/horm.2002.1484 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Associations between serum parameters for 8 different SNPs in CYP2R1, presenting p-values by ANOVA.

N = 2870. SNP = Single Nucleotide Polymorphism, PTH = Parathyroid hormone, FGF23 = Fibroblast growth factor 23, GFR = Glomerular filtration rate.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

The raw data underlying this study are restricted to protect participant privacy, as required by data protection acts in Sweden. Data will be made available upon request to researchers who qualify for access to confidential data by contacting the following: Regionala Etikprövningsnämnden i Göteborg, Box 401, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden, Regionala etikprövningsnämnden i Lund, Box 133, 221 00 Lund, Sweden; and Regionala Etikprövningsnämnden i Uppsala, Drottninggatan 4, 753 09 Uppsala, Sweden. A non-author point of contact to which data requests can be sent is: Lars.Jehpsson@skane.se.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES