Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 14;7:e40690. doi: 10.7554/eLife.40690

Figure 1. BUB-1 inhibits chromosome biorientation.

(A) Assay for kinetochore-microtubule attachment formation and chromosome congression. GFP::γ-Tub is used to measure the pole to pole distance, and KNL-1::mCherry is used to measure the chromosome span in the spindle pole axis. (B) Kymographs generated from embryos expressing GFP::γ-Tub and KNL-1::mCherry, for the different indicated conditions. Horizontal scale bar, 5 μm; Vertical scale bar, 20 s. (C) Chromosome span and pole to pole distance as functions of time after NEBD for the indicated conditions. Top right corner: Arrowhead, spindle pole bump following BUB-1 depletion. (D) Schematics of BUB-1 at kinetochores recruiting its downstream partners HCP-1/2CENP-F and CLS-2CLASP. (E) Top: Representative images from time-lapse movies showing BUB-1 dependent localisations of GFP::HCP-1CENP-F, GFP::HCP-2CENP-F and CLS-2CLASP::GFP on chromosomes (H2B::mCherry), at metaphase. Bottom: Quantification of the GFP signal on chromosomes at metaphase. Mann Whitney tests were used to determine significance (GFP::HCP-1 p < 0.0001, GFP::HCP-2 p = 0.0003, CLS-2::GFP p < 0.0001). Scale bar, 5 μm. (F) Immunofluorescent staining of kinetochores (KNL-1) and microtubules (DM1α) in Δhcp-2 zygotes at metaphase in the indicated conditions. Scale bar, 5 μm. Magnifications of the kinetochore region (highlighted by a dashed rectangle) are shown on the right of each panel. Arrows point to bent merotelic kinetochores in the BUB-1-depleted zygote. Arrowheads show a mono-oriented chromosome in the HCP-1CENP-F-depleted zygote. Scale bar, 1 μm. (G) Representative images of kinetochores (KNL-1::mCherry, green) and spindle poles (GFP::γ-Tub, magenta), at different times from the onset of chromosome segregation, for the indicated conditions. White arrows point towards sister kinetochores. White asterisks indicate the presence of kinetochore stretches. Scale bar, 5 μm. (H) Quantification of the percentage of embryos with chromosomes engaged in amphitelic, merotelic and mono-oriented attachments, in the indicated conditions. Error bars represent the SEM.

Figure 1—source data 1. Chromosome span and pole to pole distance as functions of time after NEBD for the indicated conditions.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.40690.008
Figure 1—source data 2. GFP::HCP-1, GFP::HCP-2, and CLS-2::GFP signals on chromosomes at metaphase.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.40690.009
Figure 1—source data 3. Percentage of embryos with chromosomes engaged in amphitelic, merotelic and mono-oriented attachments, in the indicated conditions.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.40690.010

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. HCP-1/2CENP-F and CLS-2CLASP downstream of BUB-1 prevent premature chromosome segregation.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) Representative images from time-lapse movies showing BUB-1 dependent localizations of GFP::HCP-1CENP-F, GFP::HCP-2CENP-F and CLS-2CLASP::GFP on chromosomes (H2B::mCherry), at different times relative to NEBD and Anaphase onset. (B) Quantifications of the integrated GFP::HCP-1CENP-F, GFP::HCP-2CENP-F, and CLS-2CLASP::GFP signals measured on chromosomes as a function of time from NEBD, for the indicated conditions. (C) Schematic of the separase-sensor allowing detection of anaphase onset by the loss of GFP signal from centromeres. (D) Representative images from time-lapse movies of embryos expressing H2B::mCherry and the GFP-tagged anaphase sensor, in the indicated conditions. (E) Quantifications of the integrated GFP signal measured on chromosomes as a function of time from NEBD, for the indicated conditions. Arrows indicate the time of chromosome segregation onset for the different conditions. Error bars represent the SEM. Scale bars, 5 μm.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. GFP::HCP-1, GFP::HCP-2, and CLS-2::GFP signals on chromosomes over time.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.40690.004
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Quantifications of the integrated anaphase sensor GFP signal measured on chromosomes over time.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.40690.005
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Characterization of the Δhcp-1 and Δhcp-2 alleles.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

(A) Western blot against HCP-2CENP-F, in the indicated strains, using polyclonal antibodies targeting the HCP-2CENP-F N-Terminal or C-Terminal region. α-Tubulin is used as a loading control. (B) Kymographs generated from embryos expressing GFP::γ-Tub and KNL-1::mCherry for the indicated conditions. (C) Chromosome span and pole to pole distance as functions of time after NEBD for the indicated conditions. (D) Western blot against HCP-1CENP-F, in the indicated strains, using polyclonal antibodies targeting HCP-1CENP-F C-Terminal region. α-Tubulin is used as a loading control. (E) Kymographs generated from embryos expressing H2B::mCherry, for the different indicated conditions. (F) Representative fixed zygotes in metaphase, stained for DNA, α-Tubulin, BUB-1, and HCP-1/2CENP-F for the indicated conditions. Error bars represent the SEM. Horizontal scale bars, 5 μm; Vertical scale bars, 20 s.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Chromosome span and pole to pole distance as functions of time after NEBD for the indicated conditions.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.40690.007