. 2017 Oct 12;25(8):1772–1780. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.10.015

Table 1.

Flower yield of mycorrhizal (+AMF) and non-mycorrhizal (−AMF) damask rose plants grown under different irrigation-stressed levels.

Treatments		Flower fresh weight (g plant⁻¹)	Flower dry weight (g plant⁻¹)	Number of flowers (flowers plant⁻¹)	Flower diameter (cm)
Irrigation (% FC)	AMF status	Flower fresh weight (g plant⁻¹)	Flower dry weight (g plant⁻¹)	Number of flowers (flowers plant⁻¹)	Flower diameter (cm)
100	−AMF	253.49c	113.38c	8.33b	8.83c
100	+AMF	350.58a	174.01a	12.67a	12.83a
75	−AMF	216.30de	93.82d	7.67bc	7.17de
75	+AMF	298.83b	165.72a	11.00a	11.50b
50	−AMF	194.79e	89.09d	6.33c	6.17e
50	+AMF	229.90cd	152.45b	7.67bc	8.17cd
25	−AMF	0.00g	0.00f	0.00e	0.00f
25	+AMF	146.62f	75.89e	3.33d	6.37e

Values in each column followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.

FC: Field capacity.