Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 12;25(8):1772–1780. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.10.015

Table 2.

Leaf net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (gs) of mycorrhizal (+AMF) and non-mycorrhizal (−AMF) damask rose plants grown under different irrigation-stressed levels during vegetative growth and flowering stages.

Treatments
Vegetative growth stage
Flowering stage
Irrigation (% FC) AMF status Pn
(µmol m−2 s−1)
E
(mmol m−2 s−1)
gs
(mol m−2 s−1)
Pn
(µmol m−2 s−1)
E
(mmol m−2 s−1)
gs
(mol m−2 s−1)
100 −AMF 2.58cd 0.51d 0.02d 3.39b 0.64b 0.03bcd
+AMF 3.58b 0.46d 0.02d 3.13b 1.26a 0.01d
75 −AMF 2.99bc 1.19cd 0.05cd 3.35b 1.25a 0.05abc
+AMF 5.73a 3.83a 0.22a 6.00a 1.58a 0.02cd
50 −AMF 2.67c 0.86cd 0.03cd 2.16b 0.73b 0.02cd
+AMF 2.70c 2.78b 0.15b 2.96b 1.38a 0.07ab
25 −AMF 1.91de 1.18cd 0.07cd 2.00b 1.45a 0.06abc
+AMF 1.29e 1.37c 0.1bc 1.80b 1.56a 0.08a

Values in each column followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.

FC: Field capacity.