Table 2.
Drug, dose, route of administration, reference | Study group, size, NYHA class, age and sex | Renal disease * | Hepatic disease * | F | C max | C ss | T max | V D | CL | t 1/2 | AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bumetanide, 3 mg, oral and i.v. 51 | HF: n = 6, NYHA III‐IV, age 60 ± 12 years, 5M/1FC: n = 4, age 30 ± 7 years, 4M/0F | Yes | No | → | → | n/a | → | → | →a↓ (−44%) | → | n/a |
Bumetanide, 1‐2 mg, oral 53 | HF: n = 20, NYHA I‐IV, age 33–74 years, 14M/4FC: n = 10, age n/a, 10M/0F | Yes | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ↑ (+144%) | n/a |
Furosemide, 40–80 mg, oral 53 | HF: n = 20, NYHA I‐IV, age 33–74 years, 14M/4FC: n = 10, age n/a, 10M/0F | Yes | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ↑ (+70%) | n/a |
Furosemide, 40 mg, oral and i.v. 52 | HF: n = 17, NYHA, age and M/F n/aC: n = 8, age 22–27 years, 5M/3F | Yes | n/a | → | n/a | n/a | n/a | → | → | → | n/a |
Furosemide, 40 mg, i.v. 38 | HF: n = 6, NYHA n/a, age 69 ± 24 years, M/F n/aC: n = 8, age 52 years, 6M/2F | No | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | → | ↓ (−50%) | → | n/a |
Hydroflumethiazide, 25 mg, oral 39 | HF: n = 9, NYHA I‐III, age 65 ± 11 years, 9M/0FC: n = 5, age 29 ± 1 years, 4M/1F | No | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ↓ (−52%) | → | ↓ (−42%) | → |
Metolazone, 2.5 mg, oral 40 | HF: n = 3, NYHA and age n/a, 2M/1FC: n = 3, age n/a, 3M/0F | No | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | → | n/a | n/a |
AUC, area under the curve; C: controls; CL, clearance; C max, maximum plasma/serum concentration; C ss, concentration at steady state; F, bioavailability; F, female; HF, patients with heart failure; M, male; n/a not available/reported; NYHA, New York Heart Association functional class; T max, time to reach the maximum plasma/serum concentration; t 1/2, elimination half‐life; VD, volume of distribution;
, significant; ↑, significantly increased; ↓, significantly decreased; →, not statistically different;
No significant differences in clearance between heart failure patients and controls after i.v. dose, clearance in heart failure patients was significantly lower than controls after oral dose;
no statistical analysis reported