Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 12;70(4):421–426. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2018.07.007

Table 4.

Uni-variate and multi-variate regression analysis for possible predictors of no-reflow.

Predictors Uni-variate regression analysis
Multi-variate regression analysis
Odds ratio 95% CI P value Odds ratio 95% CI P value
Age ≥ 60 1.73 (1.1–2.86) 0.032* 0.99 (0.41–2.43) 0.997
Female gender 1.948 (1.13–3.36) 0.016* 2.272 (0.83–6.3) 0.11
Symptoms- FMC ≥ 4 h 6.91 (3.39–14.1) 0.001* 7.794 (2.45–24.8) <0.001*
Anterior Infarctions 2.84 (1.63–4.9) 0.001* 5.951 (1.942–18.24) 0.002*
Initial TIMI ≤ 1 4.40 (1.51–12.8) 0.007* 0.236 (0.04–1.6) 0.13
Syntax score ≥ 19.22 6.89 (3.6–13.2) <0.001* 6.515 (2.26–18.78) 0.001*
Lesion length ≥ 21 mm 2.82 (1.54–5.2) <0.001* 1.049 (0.36–3.04) 0.93
Reference lumen diameter ≥ 3 mm 16.78 (5.93–47.5) <0.001* 31.066 (7.94–121.5) <0.001*
High thrombus burden 45.84 (16.1–130.3) <0.001* 58.764 (15.23–226.7) <0.001*
Direct stenting 0.12 (0.03–0.4) <0.001* 0.866 (0.23–3.26) 0.83
Thrombus aspiration# 0.42 (0.22–0.82) 0.011*

FMC, First medical contact; TIMI, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction; mm, millimeter.

*

Statistically significant.

#

After correction of Co-varieties including only patients with high thrombus burden.