Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr;18(2):118–122. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-2-118

Table 2.

Number of patients requiring therapy; sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV with increasing GBS

GBS Therapeutic intervention (n = 63) Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
0 0 100% (94.31–100) 18.45% (14.45–23.02) 18.69% (17.93–19.48) 100%
≤1 0 100% (94.31–100) 30.65% (25.77–35.89) 21.28% (20.12–22.50) 100%
≤2 2 (1.49%) 96.83% (89.00–99.61) 39.88% (34.61–45.34) 23.19% (21.50–24.98) 98.53% (94.45–99.62)
≤3 2 (1.24%) 96.83% (89.00–99.61) 47.92% (42.47–53.41) 25.85% (23.76–28.05) 98.77% (95.35–99.69)
≤4 6 (3.17%) 90.48% (80.41–96.42) 54.56% (48.97–59.88) 27.14% (24.43–30.03) 96.83% (93.40–98.50)
≤5 12 5.71%) 80.95% (69.09–89.75) 58.93% (53.46–64.24) 26.98% (23.67–30.57) 94.29% (90.78–96.51)
≤6 13 (5.83%) 79.37% (67.30–88.53) 62.5% (57.08–67.69) 28.41% (24.77–32.36) 94.17% (90.81–96.35)
≤7 19 (7.31%) 68.25% (55.31–79.42) 71.43% (66.27–76.20) 30.94% (26.08–36.25) 92.31% (89.25–94.55)
≤8 21 (7.45%) 65.08% (52.03–76.66) 77.38% (72.53–81.74) 35.04% (29.21–41.36) 92.2% (89.36–94.33)

GBS = Glasgow Blatchford score; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value