Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 19;8(12):e022578. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022578

Table 1.

Overview of characteristics of included studies in this review

Authors (year) Geography Sample year Cases Controls Assessment methods Number of measurement levels* NOS score†
Dich. Nom. Ord. Cont.
1 Cannon and colleagues9 USA 1995–1997 353 3 894 874 Record documentation 1 2 4
2 Ceccanti and colleagues40 Italy 2014 39 108 Interview 1 6 9
3 Coyne and colleagues41 Australia 1994–2006 54 56 Self-report 2 5
4 Davies and colleagues42 South Africa 2002–2003 39 36 Interview 1 6
5 May and colleagues43 South Africa 46 42 Interview 4 6
6 May and colleagues44 South Africa 1999–2001 53 116 Interview 4 7
7 May and colleagues45 South Africa 61 133 Interview 5 7
8 May and colleagues46 South Africa 2002 49 FAS, 15 pFAS 133 Interview 1 4 7 6
9 May and colleagues47 Italy 2011 8 FAS, 34 pFAS, 30 FASD 122 Interview 4 9
10 May and colleagues48 South Africa 2013 63 FAS, 48 pFAS, 32 ARND 81 Interview 4 7
11 May and colleagues49 South Africa 2013 68 FAS, 52 pFAS, 35 ARND 90 Interview 7 1 7
12 May and colleagues50 USA 2010–2011 30 80 Interview 2 4 7
13 May and colleagues28 South Africa 43 85 Interview 5 7
14 May and colleagues51 South Africa 2011 118 FAS, 91 pFAS, 55 ARND 100 Interview 11 8 7
15 Miller and colleagues52 USA 1992–1994 22 2 14 499 Unknown 1 7
16 O’Leary and colleagues53 Australia 1995–1997 Self-report 3 6
17 Petković and Barišić54 Croatia 55 769 Self-report 5 7
18 Suttie and colleagues55 South Africa 2013 22 FAS, 26 pFAS 69 Interview 3 5
19 Urban and colleagues56 South Africa 2001–2004 82 74 Interview 1 6
20 Viljoen and colleagues57 South Africa 2001 31 31 Interview 4 6
21 Viljoen and colleagues58 South Africa 2005 53 116 Interview 5 7

*Measurements of maternal alcohol drinking behaviour are categorised in three different levels: dichotomous (‘Dich.’, eg, yes/no), nominal (‘Nom.’, eg, admitted, negative and unanswered), ordinal (‘Ord.’, eg, <4 drinks and >4 drinks), continuous (‘Cont.’, eg, %). The measures represent the different questions asked for each category (eg, ‘drank during the first trimester of pregnancy’).

†Each study was assessed using the adapted version of the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). Scores were allocated from a scale from 0 (poor quality) to a maximum of 10 stars (excellent quality). For more detailed information, see resource 5.

ARND, alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorder; FAS, fetal alcohol syndrome; FASD, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders; PFAS, partial fetal alcohol syndrome.