Table 1.
Authors (year) | Geography | Sample year | Cases | Controls | Assessment methods | Number of measurement levels* | NOS score† | ||||
Dich. | Nom. | Ord. | Cont. | ||||||||
1 | Cannon and colleagues9 | USA | 1995–1997 | 353 | 3 894 874 | Record documentation | 1 | 2 | 4 | ||
2 | Ceccanti and colleagues40 | Italy | 2014 | 39 | 108 | Interview | 1 | 6 | 9 | ||
3 | Coyne and colleagues41 | Australia | 1994–2006 | 54 | 56 | Self-report | 2 | 5 | |||
4 | Davies and colleagues42 | South Africa | 2002–2003 | 39 | 36 | Interview | 1 | 6 | |||
5 | May and colleagues43 | South Africa | 46 | 42 | Interview | 4 | 6 | ||||
6 | May and colleagues44 | South Africa | 1999–2001 | 53 | 116 | Interview | 4 | 7 | |||
7 | May and colleagues45 | South Africa | 61 | 133 | Interview | 5 | 7 | ||||
8 | May and colleagues46 | South Africa | 2002 | 49 FAS, 15 pFAS | 133 | Interview | 1 | 4 | 7 | 6 | |
9 | May and colleagues47 | Italy | 2011 | 8 FAS, 34 pFAS, 30 FASD | 122 | Interview | 4 | 9 | |||
10 | May and colleagues48 | South Africa | 2013 | 63 FAS, 48 pFAS, 32 ARND | 81 | Interview | 4 | 7 | |||
11 | May and colleagues49 | South Africa | 2013 | 68 FAS, 52 pFAS, 35 ARND | 90 | Interview | 7 | 1 | 7 | ||
12 | May and colleagues50 | USA | 2010–2011 | 30 | 80 | Interview | 2 | 4 | 7 | ||
13 | May and colleagues28 | South Africa | 43 | 85 | Interview | 5 | 7 | ||||
14 | May and colleagues51 | South Africa | 2011 | 118 FAS, 91 pFAS, 55 ARND | 100 | Interview | 11 | 8 | 7 | ||
15 | Miller and colleagues52 | USA | 1992–1994 | 22 | 2 14 499 | Unknown | 1 | 7 | |||
16 | O’Leary and colleagues53 | Australia | 1995–1997 | Self-report | 3 | 6 | |||||
17 | Petković and Barišić54 | Croatia | 55 | 769 | Self-report | 5 | 7 | ||||
18 | Suttie and colleagues55 | South Africa | 2013 | 22 FAS, 26 pFAS | 69 | Interview | 3 | 5 | |||
19 | Urban and colleagues56 | South Africa | 2001–2004 | 82 | 74 | Interview | 1 | 6 | |||
20 | Viljoen and colleagues57 | South Africa | 2001 | 31 | 31 | Interview | 4 | 6 | |||
21 | Viljoen and colleagues58 | South Africa | 2005 | 53 | 116 | Interview | 5 | 7 |
*Measurements of maternal alcohol drinking behaviour are categorised in three different levels: dichotomous (‘Dich.’, eg, yes/no), nominal (‘Nom.’, eg, admitted, negative and unanswered), ordinal (‘Ord.’, eg, <4 drinks and >4 drinks), continuous (‘Cont.’, eg, %). The measures represent the different questions asked for each category (eg, ‘drank during the first trimester of pregnancy’).
†Each study was assessed using the adapted version of the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). Scores were allocated from a scale from 0 (poor quality) to a maximum of 10 stars (excellent quality). For more detailed information, see resource 5.
ARND, alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorder; FAS, fetal alcohol syndrome; FASD, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders; PFAS, partial fetal alcohol syndrome.