Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 28;2018:1827937. doi: 10.1155/2018/1827937

Table 1.

Comparison of GSRS score between HC and D-IBS and between D-IBS (−) and D-IBS (+) patients.

HC D-IBS D-IBS (−) D-IBS (+)
GSRS single items
Epigastric pain 1 (1–1) 3.5 (1–7) 5 (1–7) 2 (1–6)
Gastric hunger pain 1 (1–1) 2 (1–7) 1 (1–7) 2 (1–5)
Abdominal continuous pain 1 (1–1) 1 (1–5) 3 (1–5) 1 (1–5)
Abdominal colic pain 1 (1–1) 2 (1–7) 5 (1–7) 1 (1–7)
Abdominal indefinite pain 1 (1–1) 1 (1–5) 1 (1–5) 1 (1–3)
Nausea 1 (1–1) 1 (1–6) 2 (1–6) 1 (1–4)
Burping 1 (1–1) 2 (1–7) 1 (1–7) 3 (1–5)
Borborygmi 1 (1–1) 2 (1–7) 2 (1–7) 2 (1–7)
Abdominal distension 1 (1–1) 5 (1–7) 5 (1–7) 5 (1–7)
Flatulence 1 (1–1) 4.5 (1–7) 5 (1–7) 3 (1–6)
Postprandial fullness 1 (1–1) 3 (1–7) 4 (1–7) 3 (1–5)
Early satiety 1 (1–1) 1 (1–7) 1 (1–7) 1 (1–7)
Increased passage of stools 1 (1–1) 1 (1–7) 1 (1–3) 1 (1–7)
Soft stool 1 (1–1) 1 (1–7) 3 (1–5) 1 (1–7)
Urgent bowel movement 1 (1–1) 1.5 (1–7) 1 (1–7) 2 (1–7)
Bristol score 4 (3–4) 4 (3–7) 5 (3–6) 3 (3–7)
GSRS cluster scores
Pain syndrome 6 (6–6) 13 (6–25) 16 (7–25) 11 (6–22)
Indigestion syndrome 6 (6–6) 19 (7–38) 19 (7–38) 22 (12–36)
Diarrhoea syndrome 3 (3–3) 5 (3–21) 7 (3–15) 5 (3–21)

HC: healthy controls; D-IBS (+)/(−): diarrhoea-predominant IBS according to presence/absence of impaired permeability. Data are expressed as median and range and were analysed by rank sum test. (p < 0.05).