Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 15;10(12):487–495. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i12.487

Table 2.

Matching factors between two groups after propensity score matching

ESD-C n = 44 ESD-O n = 44 P value ASD
Variable matching between groups
Age, yr; mean ± SD 73.16 ± 8.59 71.11 ± 8.81 0.2732 0.2360
Sex: Male/female 8/36 6/38 0.7721 0.1250
Underlying disease: No/yes 28/16 29/15 11 0.0476
Anti-thrombotic drugs: No/yes 2/42 3/41 11 0.0983
Tumor location: Upper third/others 7/37 2/42 0.2501 0.3810
Tumor position: Lessor/others 19/25 21/23 0.8311 0.0914
Morphology: Flat or depressed/others 25/19 28/16 0.6631 0.1400
Histology: Undifferentiated/others 0/44 0/44 - 0
Tumor size, mm: mean ± SD 16.89 ± 12.65 20.90 ± 13.30 0.0762 0.3090
Tumor depth: Mucosa/submucosa Jun-38 Jun-38 11 0
Ulceration, positive 6 (13.6%) 4 (9.1%) 0.7391 0.1440
Operator skill: Expert/trainee 14/30 14/30 11 0
1

P value was calculated using Fisher’s exact test;

2

P value was calculated using a t test for continuous data. ESD-C: Endoscopic submucosal dissection with Clutch Cutter; ESD-O: Endoscopic submucosal dissection with another end-knife; SD: Standard deviation; ASD: Absolute standardized difference.