Table 2.
Types of failure mode of different groups investigated.
| Type of failure | Description of failure mode |
|---|---|
| Type 1 | Cohesive failure within the post |
|
| |
| Type 2 | Adhesive failure between post and luting cement with no cement on post surface can be detected. This is considered total adhesive failure between post surface and the luting cement |
|
| |
| Type 3 | Cohesive failures within the luting cement where the luting cement covers all post surface and the simulated acrylic canal |
|
| |
| Type 4 | Adhesive failure between the luting cement and the simulated acrylic canal where the luting cement covers all post surface and no luting cement covers the simulated acrylic canal |
|
| |
| Type 5 | Mixed failure subtype-1 where the luting cement covers 25–50% of the post surface. This is regarded as predominantly adhesive failure between the post surface and the luting cement |
|
| |
| Type 6 | Mixed failure subtype-2 where the luting cement covers 75% of the post surface. This is regarded as minimal adhesive failure between the post surface and the luting cement |