Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 18;9:662. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00662

Table 4.

Distribution and multivariate analysis of UGT1A1 genotypes for participants with and without NAFLD.

Explanatory variables NAFLD Non-NAFLD P-value OR (95%CI) P-value OR (95% CI)adjusted P-valueadjusted
(n = 76) (n = 327)
TB (μmol/L) 16.2 ± 8.6 15.6 ± 7.5 0.548 1.009 (0.979–1.041) 0.547 1.028 (0.971–1.088) 0.349
DB (μmol/L) 5.9 ± 4.7 5.7 ± 2.4 0.622 1.025(0.949–1.107) 0.526 1.028 (0.861–1.227) 0.763
IB (μmol/L) 10.2 ± 4.9 9.9 ± 5.5 0.523 1.011(0.968–1.057) 0.622 1.045 (0.962–1.234) 0.300
VARIANT UGT1A1*6
G/G 38 (50.0%) 211 (64.5%) 1.000
G/A or A/A 38 (50.0%) 116 (35.5%) 0.019 1.819 (1.099–3.009) 0.020 1.638 (0.780–3.442) 0.193
VARIANT UGT1A1*28
6/6 55 (72.4%) 233 (71.3%) 1.000
6/7 or 7/7 21 (27.6%) 94 (28.7%) 0.846 0.946 (0.542–1.652) 0.846 1.395 (0.614–3.170) 0.427
COMPOUND VARIANT GENOTYPES
6/6; G/G or G/A; 6/6 or 6/7; G/G 70 (92.1%) 305 (93.3%) 1.000
G/A or A/A and 6/7 or 7/7 6 (7.9%) 22 (6.7%) 0.719 1.118 (0.465–3.040) 0.719 2.131 (0.589–7.704) 0.249

Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, and uric acid were also included in the regression model and were not significant (each P > 0.05). Adjusted for age, sex, ALT, WBC, and BMI.