Table 4.

Models selected to explain the frequency of bushpig visits and presence of bushpig tracks in crop fields yielded by questionnaires, CT or tracks observation.

Method	Response variable	Explanatory variable and modality	OR and 95% interval	P-value of the Wald test	R2m	R2c
Questionnaire	Frequency of	Crop
	bushpig visits	Cassava	Ref
		Groundnut	0.79 [0.51–1.23]	0.312
		Sweet potato	0.43 [0.23–0.78]	0.008
		Maize, sorghum, millet	0.49 [0.33–0.72]	<0.001	0.453	0.616
		Other	0.04 [0.02–0.07]	<0.001
		Distance crop field-park boundary	0.50 [0.27–0.87]	0.015
Camera-traps	Frequency of bushpig visits	Data did not allow to select a model
Tracks	Presence/absence of bushpig tracks	Distance crop field- river	7.6 [1.72–2540]	0.122
		Season			0.381	0.765
		Dry	Ref
		Rainy	11.3 [1.69–2286]	0.068

For each explanatory variable selected in the models, the table gives the modalities compared, the estimate of odds-ratio with 95% confidence interval and P-value of the Wald test. Marginal (R2m) and conditional (R2c) squared R are given for each selected model.