Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 19;6:367. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00367

Table 2.

Comparison of blood lead levels in women of childbearing age from developed and other developing countries.

References Country (City) Year of survey Age (Years) Sample size
(n)
Mean ± SD (Range) BLL (μg/dl) BLL ≥10 μg/dl (%) Population description Exposure Source(s) Exposure effect(s) Risk factors for elevated BLL
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
McMichael et al. (58) Australia (Port Pirie) 1979–1982 NR 512 11.2 ± 2.1 NR Port Pirie pregnant women Lead Smelter Positive association with pre-term NR
150 7.5 ± 0.25 Non- Port Pirie pregnant women delivery.
Flanigan et al. (59) USA 1988–1989 15–44 541 7.9a 26.8 Pregnant women NR NR NR
315 8.8a 34.5 Non-pregnant women of childbearing age
West et al. (60) USA (Columbia) 1985–1990 16–35 97 6.36 ± 0.19 (2.7–12.6) NR African American pregnant women attending prenatal clinics NR No association with birth weight NR
Sowers et al. (27) USA (New Jersey) NR 12–34 705 1.2a NR Pregnant women in prenatal clinic NR Positive
association with hypertension in pregnancy/toxemia
NR
Schell et al. (61) USA (Albany New York) 1992–1998 23.5 ± 5.49 211 1.9 ± 1.68 0.47 Women in 1st,
2nd trimester,
3rd trimesters, respectively from socioeconomically disadvantaged population
NR Positive association with newborn blood lead concentration NR
1.8 ± 1.63
1.8 ± 1.65
Harville et al. (62) USA (Pittsburgh) 1992–1995 NR 140 1.96a 0.5–4.7 None Pregnant women in prenatal clinic NR NR NR
Lee et al. (63) USA NR 20–49 4394 1.78a NR Women of childbearing age in USA (NHANES) NR Inverse association with hematocrit Inversely associated with poverty income ratio, education level, intake of thiamine.
Positively associated with ethnicity [Black, Hispanic], living in urban areas, age, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, serum protoporphyrin, and intake of pyridoxine, iron, and folate
Sanders et al. (64) USA (North Carolina) 2009–2011 15–43 211 0.890a None Pregnant women residing in North Carolina NR NR Maternal county of residence and race
Taylor et al. (65, 66) UK (Bristol) 1991–1992 4,285 3.67 ± 1.47 (0.41–19.14) NR Pregnant women in ALSPAC STUDY NR Positively associated with preterm delivery, birth weight, head circumference and crown–heel length, but not on the incidence of low birth weight. Positively associated with higher education attainment, cigarette smoking, alcohol and coffee drinking, and heating the home with a coal fire
Canas et al. (67) Spain 2009–2010 18–45 700 1.8a NR Women of childbearing age in a general adult population study (BIOAMBIENTS project) NR NR NR
King et al. (68) USA 2009–2011 NR 310 0.34b (0.16–0.83) NR Pregnant women NR NR Living in urban environment
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
Ong et al. (69) Singapore 1989 NR 36 5.3 ± 2.26 (1.4–9.9) None Pregnant women at delivery NR NR NR
Awasthi et al. (70) India (Lucknow) NR NR 500 14.3a 63.8 Pregnant women living in slums of India NR NR Living near heavy traffic road,
Higher parity
Hisham et al. (71) Malaysia 1996 NR 97 8.59a 27.8 Pregnant women admitted for delivery. NR NR Ethnicity: IndianBeing a house wife
Borja-Aburto et al. (35) Mexico city 1994-1996 NR 35 12.03a NR Pregnant women who had spontaneous abortion NR Positively associated with spontaneous abortion NR
60 10.09a Pregnant women who did not have spontaneous abortion
Srivastava et al. (72) India (Lucknow) NR NR 24 13.88 ± 8.1 (2.42–33.76) 53 Mothers whose babies had IUGR NR Positively associated with IUGR NR
10.29 ± 5.69 (2.64–25.02) Mothers with normal babies
Vigeh et al. (73) Iran (Tehran) NR 17–40 55 4.8 ± 1.9
(1.9 −10.6)
NR Normotensive pregnant women in their 3rd trimester NR Positively associated with hypertension in pregnancy NR
5.7 ± 2 (2.2–12.6) Hypertensive pregnant women in their 3rd trimester
Magri et al. (28) Malta NR 30 ± 6 30 9.6 ± 6 Hypertensive pregnant women in their 3rd trimester NR Positively associated with blood pressure and hypertension in pregnancy NR
27 ± 6 93 5.8 ± 3 Normotensive pregnant women in their 3rd trimester
Kirel et al. (74) Turkey (Eskisehir) NR NR 143 2.8 ± 1.5 NR Pregnant women NR NR NR
Lamadrid-Figueroa et al. (37) Mexico city 1997–2004 27.76 207 6.47 ± 4.9 NR Pregnant women who have had no previous miscarriages NR Plasma/whole blood Pb ratio associated with higher risk of miscarriages NR
5.8 ± 3.41 Pregnant women who had ≥1 previous miscarriage(s)
Lee et al. (75) Korea 2006–2007 32.6 ± 4.1 422 1.6 ± 0.77 NR Pregnant women at mid pregnancy Consumption of meat and meat products NR NR
Vigeh et al. (76) Iran (Tehran) 2003–2004 16–35 332 4.61 ± 2.37 Women with premature rupture of membrane NR Positively associated with premature rupture of membrane NR
3.69 ± 1.85 Women without premature rupture of membrane
Vigeh et al. (77) Iran (Tehran) 2003–2004 16–35 348 3.8a (1.0–20.5) Total number of pregnant women NR Positively associated with preterm birth NR
304 3.72 ± 2.03 Term birth
44 4.52 ± 1.63 Preterm birth
Rahman et al. (78) Kuwait NR 17–42 194 5.8 ± 6.5 (0.2–41.8) 28 Pregnant women at delivery NR No association with birth weight, head circumference, Crown–heel length and gestational age. NR
Tiwari et al. (79) India (Lucknow) 24–41 50 0.12 NR Pregnant women without anemia NR Positively associated with oxidative stress and anemia NR
50 1.98 ± 0.13 Mild anemia
50 2.61 ± 0.11 Moderate anemia
25 3.62 ± 0.17 Severe anemia
Bakhireva et al. (80) New Mexico 2009–2010 26.1 ± 5.5 140 NR None Pregnant women on ante-natal care in a clinic. NR NR Pica symptoms
History of elevated BLLs before pregnancy
Use of non-commercial pottery
Living in older houses
Farhat et al. (81) Iran NR NR 60 7.59 ± 3.1 (2.3–20.8) 13.3 Mothers of exclusively fed infants NR NR NR
Rahman et al. (82) Bangladesh 2008–2009 18–40 50 13.0 ± 4.52 NR Women with unexplained infertility NR Positive association with FSH level NR
7.83 ± 3.64 Fertile women
Motawei et al. (31) Egypt (Dakahlia) NR 115 37.68 ± 9.17 NR Preeclamptic pregnant women NR Positive association with Preeclampsia NR
25 14.5 ± 3.18 Healthy pregnant women
Lei et al. (44) Taiwan 2008–2010 18–45 367 1.73 ± 0.81 Infertile women NR Positive association with infertility but not levels of reproductive hormones. Use of Chinese herbal medicine
1.26 ± 0.46 Fertile women
Kim et al. (83) South Korea (Busan) 2013 22–46 142 1.02 ± 1.39
1.03 ± 1.34
NR Pregnant women at 2nd trimester, delivery and 1 year after birth, respectively NR NR NR
1.08 ± 1.34
Bayat et al. (32) Iran (Zanjan) 2015–2016 15–40 158 8.04 ± 3.4 NR Pre-eclamptic pregnant women NR Positive association with Preeclampsia NR
6.24 ± 1.74 Normal pregnant women
La-Llave-Leon et al. (84) Mexico (Durango) 2007–2008 24.32 ± 6.7 299 4.00 ± 4.08 8.7b Occupationally exposed pregnant women Occupationally exposure NR NR
2.65 ± 1.75 Non- Occupationally exposed pregnant women
La-Llave-Leon et al. (85) Mexico (Durango) 2014–2016 13–43 633 2.09 ± 2.34 4.1b Healthy pregnant women NR Negatively correlated with ALAD activity. NR
(0.48–26.85)
Li et al. (86) China (shanghai) 2010 NR 1931 3-97a (0.8–14.84) NR Pregnant women in 28–36 weeks of gestation NR Positive but non-linear association with emotional stress NR
a

Geometric mean.

b

Prevalence of BLL ≥ 5 μg/dl.