. 2018 Nov 12;11:36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.10.007

Table 1.

Performance on CANTAB tests and results from linear regression model

Task	Outcome measures	A) Descriptives: Performance results				B) Linear regression results
		Number of participants	Mean	Median	SD	Intercept (0)		Age		Sex		Education		Regression statistics
		Number of participants	Mean	Median	SD	β	SE	β (ß_age) (unstd)	P Value	β (ß_sex) (unstd)	P Value	β (ß_education) (unstd)	P Value	SD of residuals (unstd)	Adjusted R²
Paired associate learning	(1) Total errors adjusted	1349	34.3	40	16.7	−0.48	4.67	0.55	<.001	−1.20	.21	−4.73	<.001	16.04	0.07
Paired associate learning	(2) First attempt memory score	1349	7.9	8	3.9	14.59	1.08	−0.11	<.001	0.35	.11	1.41	<.001	3.86	0.07
Spatial working memory	(3) Between errors	1529	21.8	23	9.5	−4.67	2.40	0.39	<.001	1.73	<.001	−2.61	<.001	8.96	0.12
Spatial working memory	(4) Strategy	1529	18.3	19	2.7	12.09	0.70	0.09	<.001	0.87	<.001	−0.23	.12	2.54	0.08
Processing speed	(5) Median simple reaction time	1501	289.0	281.5	43.0	249.84	11.63	0.57	.001	3.82	.11	−3.39	.16	42.70	0.01
Processing speed	(6) Median five-choice reaction time	1502	327.7	322.5	43.6	263.50	11.65	0.92	<.001	4.48	.06	−1.58	.52	43.06	0.02

Abbreviations: PAL, paired associate learning; SWM, spatial working memory; RTI, reaction time; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error; unstd, unstandardized.