Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0208684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208684

Table 2. Longitudinal relations between work engagement and psychological distress (N = 1,967).

Model AGFI CFI RMSEA χ2 df p Model
comparison
Δχ2 Δdf p
[M1] Stability model .96 .98 .07 102.67 9 .00
Lagged models
[M2] PSY (T1) —> EN (T2) .96 .98 .08 100.75 8 .00 M1 vs M2 1.92 1 .17
[M3] EN (T1) —> PSY (T2) .96 .98 .07 94.62 8 .00 M1 vs M3 8.05 1 .00
[M4] EN (T1) —> PSY (T2) & EN2 (T1) —> PSY (T2) .95 .98 .08 94.42 7 .00 M1 vs M4 8.25 2 .02
M3 vs M4 0.20 1 .65
Concurrent models
[M5] PSY (T2) —> EN (T2) .98 .99 .05 53.22 8 .00 M1 vs M5 49.45 1 .00
[M6]
EN (T2) —> PSY (T2) .98 .99 .05 47.05 8 .00 M1 vs M6 55.62 1 .00
[M7] EN (T2) —> PSY (T2) & EN2 (T2) —> PSY (T2) .98 .99 .05 39.60 7 .00 M1 vs M7 63.07 2 .00
M6 vs M7 7.45 1 .01

Note. EN = Work engagement, PD = Psychological distress; T1 = Time 1, T2 = Time 2.