Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0208684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208684

Table 4. Longitudinal relations between work engagement and creative behavior (N = 1,967).

Model AGFI CFI RMSEA χ2 df p Model comparison ⊿χ2 ⊿df p
[M1] Stability model .91 .95 .12 244.00 9 .00
Lagged models
[M2] CB (T1) —> EN (T2) .90 .95 .12 235.20 8 .00 M1 vs M2 8.80 1 .00
[M3] EN (T1) —> CB (T2) .92 .96 .11 198.35 8 .00 M1 vs M3 45.65 1 .00
[M4] EN (T1) —> CB (T2) & EN2 (T1) —> CB (T2) .91 .96 .12 197.94 7 .00 M1 vs M4 46.06 2 .00
M3 vs M4 0.41 1 .52
Concurrent models
[M5] CB (T2) —> EN (T2) .96 .98 .07 83.48 8 .00 M1 vs M5 160.52 1 .00
[M6] EN (T2) —> CB (T2) .98 .99 .05 47.79 8 .00 M1 vs M6 196.21 1 .00
[M7] EN (T2) —> CB (T2) & EN2 (T2) —> CB (T2) .98 .99 .05 46.57 7 .00 M1 vs M7 197.43 2 .00
M6 vs M7 1.21 1 .27

Note. EN = Work engagement, CB = Creative behavior; T1 = Time 1, T2 = Time 2.