Skip to main content
Foodborne Pathogens and Disease logoLink to Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
. 2018 Dec 11;15(12):763–769. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2018.2440

Validation of a Simulated Commercial Frying Process to Control Salmonella in Donuts

Lakshmikantha H Channaiah 1, Minto Michael 2,, Jennifer Acuff 2, Keyla Lopez 2, Daniel Vega 2, George Milliken 3, Harshavardhan Thippareddi 4, Randall Phebus 2
PMCID: PMC6306667  PMID: 30407081

Abstract

This study validated a typical commercial donut frying process as an effective kill-step against a 7-serovar Salmonella cocktail (Newport, Typhimurium, Senftenberg, Tennessee, and three dry food isolates) when contamination was introduced through inoculated flour. The bread and pastry flour mix (3:1) was inoculated with the Salmonella cocktail, and subsequently dried back to original preinoculation moisture content, achieving a Salmonella population of 7.6 log CFU/g. Inoculated flour was used to prepare a typical commercial donut batter, which was fried using 375°F (190.6°C) oil temperature. No viable Salmonella was detected using an enrichment plating protocol in the donuts after 2 min of frying, resulting in >7-log reduction in Salmonella population. The internal donut temperature increased from ∼30°C to ∼119°C at the end of 2 min of frying. The water activities of the donut crumb and crust after 2 min of frying, followed by 30 min of ambient air cooling, were 0.944 and 0.852, respectively. The donut pH after ambient-air cooling was 5.51. The D- and z-values of the Salmonella cocktail in donut dough were determined using thermal-death-time disks and temperature-controlled water baths. The D-values of the cocktail were 8.6, 2.9, and 2.1 min at 55°C, 58°C, and 61°C, respectively, whereas the z-value was 10°C. This study validated that >7-log reduction could be achieved if donuts are fried for at least 2 min in the oil at 190.6°C, and calculated D- and z-values present the heat resistance of Salmonella in donut dough at the start of the frying processes. However, results from this study should not be extrapolated when donut composition and frying parameters are changed significantly.

Keywords: Salmonella, donuts, flour, frying, validation

Introduction

Contamination of raw ingredients used in processed foods can occur, and pathogens such as Salmonella and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli can be introduced into bakery products through a wide range of ingredients such as egg, milk products, flour, chocolate, coconut, peanut butter, fruit, spices, and yeast (Ahmad et al., 2000; Akins, 2014). Bakery products are not frequently linked to foodborne illness outbreaks; however, the potential presence of pathogens in various ingredients creates a public health risk if the product is improperly baked or fried. In addition, the ability of Salmonella to survive under various environmental stress conditions, such as low water activity (aw) and sublethal heat treatments, for lengthy periods of time makes it a challenging foodborne hazard for food manufacturers (Podolak et al., 2010; Van Doren et al., 2013). Although baking, cooking, roasting, frying, and boiling are generally considered effective kill-steps in controlling potential foodborne pathogens in food products, formal scientific evidence or validation of most of these processes for the inactivation of foodborne pathogens in bakery products has not been thoroughly investigated (Channaiah et al., 2016). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) shifted the main focus from reacting to food safety failures to proactively preventing these failures. According to the FSMA, food processors must validate all preventive controls that are process steps and critical for food safety based on the scientific evidences (FDA, 2015). Food manufacturers in the United States or those exporting to the United States need such validation documentation to support their food safety programs under the requirements of FSMA (FDA, 2015).

The main purpose of this study was to validate a frying process simulating commercial donut manufacturing to control Salmonella contamination potentially introduced through flour; thus, to produce microbiologically safe ready-to-eat donuts. In this study, a yeast-raised donut recipe was used because it is one of the most popular bakery products consumed in the United States and Canada. Through a literature search, no other study was found validating a bakery product with frying as a kill-step for Salmonella. The specific research objectives of this study were to (1) validate the frying process as a kill-step to control Salmonella in donuts and (2) determine the heat resistance parameters (D-values and z-values) of Salmonella in proofed donut dough. In addition, the aw, pH, and proximate composition of donuts were also determined.

Materials and Methods

Experimental and statistical designs

This research was divided into the following three studies: (1) validation of frying as a kill-step to inactivate a 7-serovar Salmonella cocktail in donuts during frying using 375°F (190.6°C) oil temperature for 2 min; (2) determination of the internal temperature profile, pH and aw of donuts during frying; and (3) determination of D- and z-values of the 7-serovar Salmonella cocktail in proofed donut dough.

For the frying validation study, donut dough was prepared using an inoculated (Salmonella cocktail) bread and pastry flour mix. The donuts were fried in soybean oil at 190.6°C for 2 min followed by 30 min of ambient air cooling (F+C), with product sampling at 1 and 2 min of frying and at F + C to enumerate the surviving Salmonella population. This study utilized a randomized complete block experimental design with three replications as blocks and six sampling times as treatments (inoculated flour; pre- and postproof dough; 1 and 2 min of frying; and F+C). For the temperature profiling, pH and aw determination study, noninoculated flour mix was used to prepare donut dough. This study was also designed as randomized complete block (three replications) with four sampling times as treatments (pre- and postproof dough; 2 min of frying; and F+C). Microbial, pH and aw data were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance at p ≤ 0.05 using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). An additional donut frying study was conducted using noninoculated flour mix to provide samples after frying and F + C for proximate analyses.

The mean D- and z-values were calculated from the linear regression graphs plotted using Microsoft Excel 2011 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA) for each replication separately. This study utilized a randomized complete block design with three replications and microbial plating was done in duplicate.

Salmonella cultures and flour inoculation

Three serovars of Salmonella were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Newport 6962, Senftenberg 775 W 43845 and Typhimurium 14028), and Salmonella Tennessee and three dry pet food isolates were obtained from Richter International, Inc. (Columbus, OH). These Salmonella serovars were selected because of their relatively high heat resistance, association with foodborne illness outbreaks, and/or isolation from low moisture food environment. The working cultures were propagated individually following the method described by Channaiah et al. (2017).

The bread (300 g) and pastry (100 g) flours were weighed into a sanitized sealable plastic tub (9.4 L, Rubbermaid, Atlanta, GA), mixed, and spread into a uniform layer. Flour mix was then mist-inoculated inside the biosafety cabinet as described by Channaiah et al. (2017).

Donut dough preparation

All ingredients and the dough formula used for the donut preparation were provided by AIB International, Inc., Manhattan, KS (Table 1). Flour mix and other dry ingredients were weighed into a sanitized mixing bowl (Artisan®, KitchenAid®, St. Joseph, MI) and mixed with a sanitized spatula. Yeast, shortening, and water were then added to the dry ingredients, the mixing bowl and paddle were attached to the mixer, and the ingredients were mixed for 1 min at speed-1, followed by 5 min of mixing at speed-2. The dough was rounded into a ball, placed into a greased bowl, covered with aluminum foil, and rested at room temperature (∼25°C) for 45 min. The dough was then rolled into a ½-inch (12.7 mm) sheet, and rested for 10 min at room temperature. The dough was resheeted, cut into shape using a donut cutter [3 inch (76.2 mm) diameter with 1 inch (25.4 mm) inner hole diameter], placed onto a frying screen (four donuts per frying batch), and placed inside a proofing cabinet preset at 100°F (37.8°C) and 60–70% relative humidity for 30 min.

Table 1.

Ingredients and Formula Used for Donut Dough Preparation

Ingredient Grams
Bread flour 150
Pastry flour 50
Granulated sugar 24
Nonfat dry milk 8
Salt 4
Soy flour, defatted 6
Potato flour 10
Egg yolk solids 6
Sodium stearoyl lactylate 1
Yeast, fresh compressed 12
All purpose shortening 16
Water 116

Donut frying and temperature monitoring

The donut frying parameters (oil temperature and frying time) were determined after a series of frying trials mimicking the end-product quality of commercially prepared donuts. The oil and internal donut temperatures during frying were monitored and recorded using fine-gauge thermocouples [Type-T Thermocouples (Omega Engineering, Inc., Stamford, CT)] connected to an eight-channel data logging system (USB-TC with MCC DAQ software, Measurement Computing, Norton, MA). During temperature monitoring, the data logger recorded temperatures every second. For monitoring internal donut temperatures during frying and ambient-air cooling, the thermocouples were inserted from the side into the center of two randomly selected donuts. The proofed donuts on the frying screen with attached thermocouples were transferred into the hot soybean oil at 375°F (190.6°C) and fried for 1 min on each side, followed by 30 min of ambient air-cooling on a sanitized wire rack.

Frying validation

For frying validation, donuts (prepared from inoculated flour mix) were randomly sampled at 1 and 2 min of frying, and at F+C. At each sampling point, donuts were quickly removed from the hot oil and transferred into stomacher bags containing 100 mL of chilled (∼4°C) 0.1% peptone solution, hand massaged for 1 min to arrest additional thermal microbial destruction, and analyzed to determine the surviving Salmonella population.

pH, aw, and proximate analyses of donuts

For pH and aw measurements, samples were taken at pre- and postproofing, after 2 min of frying, and F+C. Donut samples after 2 min of frying and F + C were immediately separated into crust (external) and crumb (internal) components, and analyzed. The sample pH and aw were measured as described by Channaiah et al. (2017). An additional donut frying was conducted, sampled at the previously stated times, and sent to the analytical laboratory in the Animal Sciences and Industry Department at Kansas State University for the proximate analyses of moisture, fat, protein, and starch.

D- and z-values determination

D- and z- values of the 7-serovar Salmonella cocktail in postproof donut dough were determined following the method described by Channaiah et al. (2017) using ∼6 g samples in thermal-death-time (TDT) disks and temperature-controlled water baths.

Salmonella enumeration

For the frying validation study, Salmonella population was enumerated on injury-recovery [BHI agar overlaid with Xylose lysine deoxycholate (XLD) agar] and selective media [XLD agar], whereas for the D- and z-values study, only injury-recovery media was used to enumerate Salmonella populations. The Salmonella enumeration and enrichment were conducted according to Channaiah et al., 2017.

Results and Discussion

Although, frying is an ancient and popular food preparation process, only a handful of researchers have explored the science behind validating a frying process in French fries (Palazoğlu and Gökmen, 2008), breaded pork patties (Osaili et al., 2007), meatballs (Porto-Fett et al., 2016), and in tortilla chips (Chen and Moreira, 1997) for various end-use quality parameters. In general, a better understanding of the product internal temperature and frying time are important in improving the quality as well as food safety parameter of the final product (Chen and Moreira, 1997; Osaili et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2015; Porto-Fett et al., 2016). Most of the published frying validation studies focused mainly on the change in physical and chemical parameters of the fried food product and the oil (Chen and Moreira, 1997; Osaili et al., 2007; Sébédio and Juaneda, 2007). However, considerably fewer studies have focused on validating a frying process as an effective kill-step for pathogen control (Osaili et al., 2006; Porto-Fett et al., 2016). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first frying validation study involving a bakery product for Salmonella destruction.

Donut frying temperature profile

The soybean oil temperature before the start of the frying process was maintained at ∼190°C for ∼30 min. After introducing donuts into the oil, the oil temperature decreased to ∼178°C at the end of 2 min of donut frying. The mean donut internal temperature at the start of frying was ∼30°C and increased to ∼119°C after 2 min of frying (Fig. 1). After 30 min of ambient-air cooling, the donut temperature decreased back to ∼30°C.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Temperature profile of donuts (internal) during 2 min of frying at 375°F (190.6°C) oil temperature followed by 30 min of ambient air-cooling.

Donut pH, aw, and proximate analyses

The pH and aw of pre- and postproof donut dough, and donuts after 2 min of frying and F + C are presented in Figure 2. The pH of postproof dough (4.82 ± 0.07) was similar to that of preproof dough (4.83 ± 0.04). However, the donut pH increased to 5.48 ± 0.05 and 5.51 ± 0.03 at the end of 2 min of frying and F+C, respectively. This pH increase in the fried donuts could be attributed to the oil absorbed by the donuts during the frying process. The pre- and postproof donuts had similar aw (0.953 ± 0.001 and 0.940 ± 0.013, respectively). The aw of the donut crumb after frying and F + C (0.953 ± 0.001 and 0.944 ± 0.004, respectively) remained similar to that of the dough; whereas, the aw of the donut crust decreased to 0.830 ± 0.009 and 0.852 ± 0.007 after frying and F+C, respectively.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

pH and water activity (mean ± SE) of pre- and postproof donut dough and donuts after 2 min of frying at 375°F (190.6°C) oil temperature followed by 30 min of ambient air-cooling (F+C). (A, B) Bars with different letters are statistically different (p ≤ 0.05).

The proximate analyses of donut dough and fried donuts are presented in Table 2. As expected, at F + C the moisture content of donut was lower than that of dough with greater moisture in the crumb compared to the crust. As the frying oil absorbed into the donut during the frying process, the fat content of the donut at F + C was greater than that of dough, with greater fat in the donut crust.

Table 2.

Proximate Analyses of Noninoculated Pre- and Postproof Donut Dough and Donuts After 2 Min of Frying at 375°F (190.6°C) Oil Temperature, Followed by 30 Min of Ambient Air-Cooling (F+C)

Sample % Moisture % Fat % Protein % Starch
Dough
 Preproof 41.3 5.9 9.1 39.0
 Postproof 41.0 4.8 9.9 40.5
2 min
 Crumb 33.4 19.7 7.7 32.2
 Crust 13.6 40.3 6.9 29.9
F + C
 Crumb 32.1 17.5 7.9 30.8
 Crust 18.5 31.6 8.2 32.9

Frying validation

The 7-serovar Salmonella cocktail contained 11.1 ± 0.10 log CFU/mL, and inoculated flour contained 7.6 ± 0.32 log CFU/g (as enumerated on injury-recovery media). As flour was inoculated at such high levels, the presence of Salmonella in other ingredients was not tested because Salmonella population enumerated in the current study would be directly due to the artificial inoculation. The Salmonella populations in the postproof dough (7.6 ± 0.15 and 7.2 ± 0.16 log CFU/g as determined on injury-recovery and selective media, respectively) were similar to that in the inoculated flour (Fig. 3). After 1 min of frying, the Salmonella population in donuts decreased to 6.7 log CFU/g as enumerated on both injury-recovery and selective media (Fig. 3). However, no viable Salmonella was detected in the donuts after 2 min of frying and F + C after enrichment, indicating the complete elimination of Salmonella. These results indicate that >7-log reduction of Salmonella was achieved in the donuts during the 2-min frying process. In a different study, Porto-Fett et al. (2016) evaluated the effect of deep-frying on inactivation of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in meatballs. In this study, deep-frying fresh meatballs (40 g each) in canola oil at 176.7°C for 5.5 min resulted in 5-log reduction, and cooking of fresh meatballs at 176.7°C for 12.5 min also resulted in 5-log reduction.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

7-serovar Salmonella cocktail population in inoculated flour, dough, and donuts during 2 min of frying at 375°F (190.6°C) oil temperature, followed by 30 min of ambient air-cooling (F+C). (A–C) Values with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) within the respective medium. *Values within a respective sampling point are different (p ≤ 0.05).—–: 0.40 log CFU/g detection limit. No viable Salmonella was detected (by enrichment plating) from donuts after 2 min of frying.

FSMA regulations place a greater importance on the risk assessment and prevention of food safety failures, which requires food processors to validate the food safety critical processing steps. Although in-plant validations (using nonpathogenic surrogate microbial cultures) may be the most effective form of validation, food processors are often reluctant to introduce any kind of microbial cultures into their processing facilities, and selection of an appropriate surrogate is often a challenge. Therefore, the food industry tends to rely upon published laboratory- and/or pilot-scale studies that utilize pathogens of interest and/or their surrogates. The current study, along with similar validation studies conducted for various bakery products, can be used by the bakery industry to assess the pathogen control capabilities of their manufacturing processes. In similar validation studies, Channaiah et al. (2016, 2017) validated commercially simulated baking processes as kill-steps against Salmonella in hamburger buns and plain muffins when contamination was introduced via contaminated flour.

D- and z-values

The linear regression graphs used to calculate D- and z-values are presented in Figures 4 and 5; whereas, the calculated D- and z-values of 7-serovar Salmonella cocktail in proofed donut dough are presented in Table 3. The R2 values for all regression lines were >0.9. The D-values of Salmonella cocktail were determined at much lower temperatures (55–61°C) compared with the maximum internal donut temperature (∼119°C) reached during frying because during preliminary D-values studies, the time required to achieve high target temperatures resulted in significantly lower Salmonella populations that were inadequate to calculate D-values. Although extrapolating Salmonella thermal destruction at 119°C from the data determined at 55–61°C could cause some linearity problems, these D-values were determined to estimate the Salmonella heat resistance in donut dough at the start of the frying process. The D-values of Salmonella cocktail in dough were 8.6, 2.9, and 2.1 min at 55°C, 58°C, and 61°C, respectively, with a z-value of 10°C. In similar studies, Channaiah et al. (2016, 2017) determined that a 3-serovar Salmonella cocktail (Typhimurium, Newport, and Senftenberg) in proofed hamburger bun dough and plain muffin batter had D-values of 28.6 and 62.2, 7.6, and 40.1, and 3.1 and 16.5 min at 55°C, 58°C, and 61°C, respectively, and z-values of 6.6°C and 10.4°C, respectively. The differences in the D- and z-values in the current study (proofed donut dough) and those generated by Channaiah et al. (2016, 2017) for proofed bun dough and muffin batter could be attributed to differences in the Salmonella cocktails used in these studies. Moreover, the proximate compositions of hamburger bun dough (46.9% moisture, 8.5% protein, 3.8% fat, and 40.8% starch) and muffin batter (31.2% moisture, 6.3% protein, 8.9% fat, and 24.3% starch) in Channaiah et al. (2016, 2017) studies were different than that of donut dough in the current study. The lower D-values of Salmonella cocktail in proofed donut dough compared to that in muffin batter (Channaiah et al., 2017) could also be attributed to the lower pH of proofed donut dough (4.82) than muffin batter (6.61) that would have facilitated thermal inactivation of Salmonella in donut dough. Channaiah et al. (2016) also demonstrated that the D-values of Enterococcus faecium in hamburger bun dough at 55°C, 58°C, and 61°C were approximately four to seven times greater than the 3-serovar Salmonella cocktail, and hence E. faecium can be used as a conservative surrogate strain for Salmonella to validate various thermal processes for bakery products if in-plant studies are desired.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

7-serovar Salmonella cocktail counts in proofed donut dough versus heating time as plated on injury-recovery media.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Log D-values of 7-serovar Salmonella cocktail in proofed donut dough versus dough temperature as calculated from counts on injury-recovery media.

Table 3.

D-Values (min) and z-Value (°C) (Mean ± SE) of a 7-Serovar Salmonella Cocktail in Proofed Donut Dough as Calculated from the Counts Obtained by Plating on Injury-Recovery Media

Item Calculated value
55°C 8.6 ± 1.20
58°C 2.9 ± 0.36
61°C 2.1 ± 0.28
z-value 10.0 ± 0.68

An earlier study (Osaili et al., 2006) investigated thermal inactivation kinetics of E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat chicken-fried beef patties. Osaili et al. (2006) reported an average D-values of 27.62 to 0.04 min for E. coli O157:H7, 67.68 to 0.22 min for Salmonella, and 81.37 to 0.31 min for L. monocytogenes at temperatures 55–70°C. The lower D-values for Salmonella cocktail reported in our study can be attributed to differences in food matrices used and fat content in chicken-fried beef patties. In addition to differences in food matrices and intrinsic factors, variation in the thermal resistance of the bacterial strains used to prepare the inoculum and experimental methodologies could account for differences in D-values.

Conclusions

The current study demonstrated that frying donuts at >190°C oil temperature for at least 2 min will result in >7-log reduction in Salmonella population. This study can be used by commercial donut manufacturers utilizing similar operational parameters to fulfill the FSMA requirements to scientifically validate frying a critical processing step in donut manufacturing. The D- and z-values determined in this study can also give a clear understanding of Salmonella heat resistance in proofed donut dough, and can be used for optimizing donut frying processes. It should be noted that individual donut frying processes should be validated when donut proximate composition and frying parameters are different than those studied in the current research.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by AIB International, Inc., and the authors acknowledge the baking experts at AIB International, Inc. for providing donut recipe and frying parameters for this study. The authors also acknowledge Food Safety and Defense Laboratory personal at Kansas State University for their assistance in the laboratory and pilot plant. This is the contribution number 18-188-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Manhattan, KS.

Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  1. Ahmed R, Soule G, Demczuk WH, Clark C, Khakhria R, Ratnam S, Marshall S, Ng L-K, Woodward DL, Johnson WM, Rodgers FG. Epidemiological typing of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis in a Canada-wide outbreak of gastroenteritis due to contaminated cheese. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:2403–2406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akins D. 2014. Flour food safety. Ardent Mills. Available at: http: ardentmills.com/uploads/Ardent_Mills_Flour_Food_Safety_White_Paper.pdf, accessed October11, 2017
  3. Channaiah LH, Holmgren ES, Michael M, Sevart NJ, Milke D, Schwan CL, Krug M, Wilder A, Phebus RK, Thippareddi H, Milliken G. Validation of baking to control Salmonella serovars in hamburger bun manufacturing, and evaluation of Enterococcus faecium ATCC 8459 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae as nonpathogenic surrogate indicators. J Food Protect 2016;79:544–552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Channaiah LH, Michael M, Acuff JC, Phebus RR, Thippareddi H. Olewnik M, Milliken G. Validation of the baking process as a kill-step for controlling Salmonella in muffins. Int J Food Microbiol 2017;250:1–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen Y, Moreira RG. Modelling of a batch deep-fat frying process for tortilla chips. Food Bioprod Process 1997;75:181–190 [Google Scholar]
  6. FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) 2015. Current good manufacturing practice, hazard analysis, and risk-based preventive controls for human food. Available at: www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/09/17/2015-21920/current-good-manufacturing-practice-hazard-analysis-and-risk-based-preventive-controls-for-human, accessed October11, 2017
  7. Osaili TM, Griffis CL, Martin EM, Beard BL, Keener AE, Marcy JA. Thermal inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes in breaded pork patties. J Food Sci 2007;72:M56–M61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Osaili T, Griffis CL, Martin EM, Beard BL, Keener A, Marcy JA. Thermal inactivation studies of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat chicken-fried beef patties. J Food Protect 2006;69:1080–1086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Palazoğlu TK, Gökmen V. Development and experimental validation of a frying model to estimate acrylamide levels in French fries. J Food Sci 2008;73:E109–E114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Podolak R, Enache E, Stone W, Black DG, Elliott PH. Sources and risk factors for contamination, survival, persistence, and heat resistance of Salmonella in low-moisture foods. J Food Protect 2010;73:1919–1936 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Porto-Fett ACS, Oliver M, Daniel M, Shoyer AB, Atahler LJ, Shane LE, Kassama LS, Jackson-Aavis A, Luchansky JB. Effect of deep-frying or conventional oven cooking on thermal inactivation of Shiga toxin-producing cells of Escherichia coli in meatballs. J Food Protect 2016;79:723–731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sébédio J. Juaneda P. 5-Isomeric and Cyclic Fatty Acids as a Result of Frying. In Deep Frying, Chemistry, Nutrition, and Practical Applications, 2nd edition, Edited by: Michael D. Erickson, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Published by Elsevier, Inc., pp. 57–86, 2007 [Google Scholar]
  13. Van Doren JM, Kleinmeier D, Hammack TS, Westerman A. Prevalence, serotype diversity, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in imported shipments of spice offered for entry to the United States, FY2007-FY2009. Food Microbiol 2013;34, 239–251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang X, Lahou E, Boeck ED, Devlieghere F, Geeraerd A, Uyttendaele M. Growth and inactivation of Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes in broth and validation in ground pork meat during simulated home storage abusive temperature and home pan-frying. Front Microbiol 2015;6:1161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Foodborne Pathogens and Disease are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES