Table 3.
Users’ opinion on the usability of the classification system (adapted from AbuRuz et al.) [13].
| Positive Ratings a | Neutral Ratings | Negative Ratings b | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | |||
| The DRP classification system allows me to choose the correct DRP category for the cases | 29 (87.9) | 3 (9.1) | 1 (3.0) |
| The classification system is comprehensive | 23 (69.7) | 7 (21.2) | 3 (9.1) |
| The classification system is easy to use | 24 (72.7) | 5 (15.2) | 4 (12.1) |
| I am able to categorise the different types of DRPs efficiently by using the classification system | 23 (69.7) | 7 (21.2) | 3 (9.1) |
| I will use such a classification system in future | 23 (69.7) | 6 (18.2) | 4 (12.1) |
| In general, I am satisfied with the classification system | 24 (72.7) | 8 (24.3) | 1 (3.0) |
a Positive rating includes “strongly agree” and “agree”; b Negative rating includes “strongly disagree” and “disagree”. In this study, none of the participants indicated “strongly disagree”.