Table 2.
Overview on the SGA risk after bariatric surgery, comparing malabsorptive to restrictive surgery, adapted from Johansson [29] Gascoin [63] Chevrot [139] Sheiner [101] and Ducarme [118]
| Control Group | Study | Participants | SGA | SGA after malabsorptive surgery | SGA after restrictive surgery | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women after BS vs obese controls | Johansson | 670/2356 | 15.6% vs 7.6% | n.d. | n.d. | < 0.001 |
| Women after BS vs lean pregnant women | Gascoin | 56/56 | n.d | n.d. | NS | |
| Women after malabsorptive surgery vs women with restrictive surgery | Chevrot | 58/81 | n.d. | 17 | 7 | < 0.001 |
| Women after restrictive vs women after malabsorptive surgery | Sheiner | 394/55 | n.d. | 7.3 | 12.8 | NS |
| Women after RYGB vs women after LAGB | Ducarme | 31/63 | n.d. | 32.3% | 17.1% | NS |