Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 27;12(3):502–512. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.12.003

Table 2.

KRAS Status Subgroup Analysis of the Clinical Features of Study Patients

KRAS Wild Type
(N = 18)
KRAS Mutated
(N = 23)
P
Sex, N (%) .987
 Male 11 (61.1) 14 (60.9)
 Female 7 (38.9) 9 (30.1)
Median age (range), years 63 (36-85) 61 (37-82) .651
EGFR status, N (%) .026
 Positive 9 (50.0) 19 (82.6)
 Negative 9 (50.0) 4 (17.4)
Tumor sidedness .363
 Left side 17 (94.4) 19 (82.6)
 Right side 1 (5.6) 4 (17.4)
UGT1A1 status .421
 *1/*1 16 (88.9) 17 (73.9)
 *1/*28 2 (11.1) 5 (21.7)
 *28/*28 0 (0) 1 (4.3)
Irinotecan dose, N (%), mg/m2 .375
 260 5 (27.8) 2 (8.7)
 240 3 (16.7) 2 (8.7)
 210 1 (5.6) 2 (8.7)
 180 9 (50.0) 16 (69.6)
 120 0 (0.0) 1 (4.3)
Best objective response, N (%) .190
 PR 3 (16.7) 1 (4.3)
 SD 10 (55.6) 10 (43.5)
 PD 5 (27.8) 12 (52.2)
DCR, N (%) 13 (72.2) 11 (47.8) .116
AEs .019
 Grade ≧3 15 (83.3) 11 (47.8)
 Grade <3 3 (16.7) 12 (52.2)

EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; DCR, disease control rate; AEs, adverse events.