Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov;28(6):759–770. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v28i6.11

Table 1.

Effect of topical application of the test materials on the rate of wound closure in excision wound model

Experimental
groups
Excision wound model (% of wound contraction in days) (Mean±SEM)

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Control 15.90±3.77 21.77±7.01 22.98±6.65 35.37±5.11 55.49±8.47 79.33±2.65 87.19±1.69 87.87±0.59
Honey 17.65±6.13 23.43±3.78 36.89±3.78 44.31±9.62 74.90±5.3§ 85.05±3.14 87.78±2.18 90.58±1.84
Ghee 14.26±3.74 15.54±2.95 32.91±5.85 64.68±2.78§ 74.92±2.05§ 86.55±1.58* 88.90±0.75 91.04±2.06
H+G 16.43±3.23 29.68±3.68 46.58±1.97* 63.01±3.13§ 78.71±1.84§ 88.75±2.06§ 92.19±0.86* 93.89±0.56§
GG 16.67±3.57 24.13±1.91 35.29±3.97 51.81±3.64 79.46±1.35§ 86.19±0.49 90.35±0.95 92.22±1.41
NI 11.76±2.52 20.54±2.34 42.96±8.38* 41.44±7.58 76.26±2.83§ 82.54±1.12 85.95±1.28 90.29±0.87
Tot 34.38±2.78§ 41.49±2.67§ 52.02±3.86§ 68.48±4.79§ 82.09±0.84§ 91.19±0.94§ 94.52±0.51§ 94.96±0.25§
*

p<0.05 vs control

§

p<0.01 vs control