. 2018 Oct 1;4(1):126–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2018.09.016

Table 5.

Summary of technical success in the FAS

Treatment group	No. of patients	Successful	Unsuccessful	95% CI for success rate^a	Success rate difference	95% CI for success rate difference^b	P
AMG0102	111	110 (99.1)	1 (0.9)	95.1–100.0	−0.9	−2.7 to 0.9	1.000^c
PTA	57	57 (100.0)	0 (0.0)	93.7–00.0	−0.9	−2.7 to 0.9	1.000^c

CI, confidence interval; FAS, full analysis set; PTA, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

Exact 95% CI based on binomial probability.

95% CI obtained by normal approximation to binomial probability (Wald test).

Fisher exact test.