Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 21;9:1886. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01886

Table 1.

Percentage of tiller occurrence at the different tiller position under different treatments (%).

Treatment Tiller position-XN979 Tiller position-XY22


III I-p IV I-1 II-p III I-p IV I-1 II-p
CK 96.7 a 100 a 90.0 a 93.3 a 96.7 a 83.3 a 80.0 a 83.3 a 73.3 a 70.0 a
I30 53.3 b 46.7 b 56.7 b 43.3 b 40.0 b 40.0 b 36.7 b 33.3 bc 30.0 c 36.7 b
I60 0.0 c 3.3 c 3.3 c 0.0 c 0.0 c 3.3 d 0.0 d 3.3 d 0.0 d 0.0 d
I90 0.0 c 3.3 c 0.0 c 0.0 c 0.0 c 3.3 d 0.0 d 0.0 d 0.0 d 0.0 d
Z30 100 a 96.7 a 96.7 a 93.3 a 96.7 a 83.3 a 83.3 a 83.3 a 73.3 a 73.3 a
Z60 100 a 100 a 93.3 a 96.7 a 90.0 a 86.7 a 83.3 a 83.3 a 80.0 a 70.0 a
Z90 100 a 100 a 93.3 a 93.3 a 96.7 a 86.7 a 80.0 a 80.0 a 76.7 a 66.7 a

Values followed by different letters within columns are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level. III: the thirdh primary tiller; I-p: the first secondary tiller from I; IV: the fourth primary tiller; I-1: the second secondary tiller from I; II-p: the secondary tiller from II. CK: deionized water was sprayed on the plants. I30, I60, and I90 denote 30, 60, and 90 mg L-1 IAA was sprayed on the plants, respectively. Z30, Z60, and Z90 denote 30, 60, and 90 mg L-1 Z was sprayed on the plants, respectively (n = 30).