Table 2.
Treatment | Tiller position-XN979 | Tiller position-XY22 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
III | I-p | IV | I-1 | II-p | III | I-p | IV | I-1 | II-p | |
CK | 100 a | 96.7 a | 96.7 a | 93.3 a | 90.0 a | 83.3 a | 80.0 a | 83.3 a | 73.3 a | 70.0 a |
LN | 53.3 c | 56.7 c | 33.3 c | 30.0 c | 30.0 c | 50.0 c | 46.7 c | 33.3 c | 30.0 c | 36.7 c |
LN-Z | 93.3 a | 90.0 a | 76.7 b | 66.7 b | 70.0 b | 80.0 a | 73.3 a | 53.3 b | 56.7 b | 50.0 b |
Values followed by different letters within columns are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level. III: the thirdh primary tiller; I-p: the first secondary tiller from I; IV: the fourth primary tiller; I-1: the second secondary tiller from I; II-p: the secondary tiller from II. CK: deionized water was sprayed on the plants under normal condition. LN: basal fertilizer was applied at the rate of 22.5 kg N ha-1, and deionized water was sprayed on the plants. LN+Z: basal fertilizer was applied at the rate of 22.5 kg N ha-1, and 60 mg L-1 Z was sprayed on the plants (n = 30).