Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 28.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Mar;194(3):615–622. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1022

TABLE 2:

Comparison of Sensitivity and Specificity in Neoadjuvant and Control Groups for Resectable Disease

Criteria Neoadjuvant Group Control Group

Reader 1 Reader 2 Reader 3 Reader 1 Reader 2 Reader 3

Sensitivity for resectable disease (%) 86 (6/7) 71 (5/7) 14 (1/7) 90 (9/10) 90 (9/10) 60 (6/10)
Specificity (%) 80 (4/5) 100 (5/5) 100 (5/5) 57 (12/21) 43 (9/21) 76 (16/21)
Negative predictive value (%) 80 (4/5) 71 (5/7) 46 (5/11) 92 (12/13) 90 (9/10) 80 (16/20)
Positive predictive value (%) 86 (6/7) 100 (5/5) 100 (1/1) 50 (9/18) 43 (9/21) 54 (6/11)
Accuracy (%) 83 (10/12) 83 (10/12) 50 (6/12) 68 (21/31) 58 (18/31) 71 (22/31)
True-positive resectable (no. of cases) 6 5 1 9 9 6
True-negative unresectable (no. of cases) 4 5 5 12 9 16
False-positive (no. of cases) 1 0 0 9 12 5
False-negative (no. of cases) 1 2 6 1 1 4

Note—Data in parentheses are number of cases diagnosed by reader/total number of cases according to surgical findings.