Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 28.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2015 May 14;123:50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.05.002

Table 4.

Pearson Chi-square analyses of the contingency awareness results. (HA = high anxious group; LA = low anxious group, N = no scream condition, P = predictable scream condition, U = unpredictable scream condition).

Question Group P U N Pearson c2 (2, N = 42)
Room cue
Avoid LA 10 6 8 =.307, p = .858
HA  6 5 7
Least screams LA  2 5 17 =5.79, p = .055
HA  7 2 9
Face cue
Avoid LA  9 6 9 =.445, p = .801
HA  5 5 8
Least screams LA  6 3 15 =.700, p = .705
HA  4 4 10