Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Sep 21;73(1):82–89. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.07.009

Table 1:

Simulated Data parameters vs. NEPTUNE and C-PROBE Data Parameters

eGFR Variability, SD or RMSE** Percent Missing eGFR Follow-up Values Correlation Between Successive eGFR Values*
Simulated Data 3, 5, 7, 9 0, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8
NEPTUNE 8.4 (4.3 – 13.6) 10 (0 – 25) 0.79
   MN 8.7 (5.1 – 12.0) 0 (0 – 20) 0.80
   MCD 11.3 (6.1 – 17.4) 14 (0 – 33) 0.56
   FSGS 7.5 (4.0 – 13.7) 10 (0 – 25) 0.85
   IgAN 5.5 (3.3 – 8.8) 0 (0 – 11) 0.93
C-PROBE 2.0 (0 – 6.4) 0 (0 – 29) 0.86
   Diabetic nephropathy 0.5 (0 – 4.6) 0 (0 – 27) 0.90
   CAKUT 0.3 (0 – 3.1) 0 (0 – 0) 0.82
   Glomerular disease 3.5 (0 – 9.2) 0 (0 – 33) 0.83
   Hypertensive nephropathy 2.1 (0 – 6.2) 0 (0 – 29) 0.85
   Other/Unknown 1.7 (0 – 4.6) 0 (0 – 25) 0.89

Unless otherwise indicated, values shown are median (interquartile range).

*

For NEPTUNE and C-PROBE data: estimated from linear generalized estimating equation model

**

SD for simulations; RMSE for NEPTUNE data.

NEPTUNE, Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network; C-PROBE, Clinical Phenotyping and Resource Biobank Core; SD: standard deviation; RMSE: root mean squared error; MN: membranous nephropathy, MCD: minimal change disease, FSGS: focal segmental glomerularsclerosis, IgAN: immunoglobulin A nephropathy; CAKUT: congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract.