. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Nov 13;130(1):180–188. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.10.007

Table 3:

Percentage of eyes defined as abnormal

	GCIPLT^§	RNFLT^§	TRNFLT^§	GCIPLT/RNFLT	Amp^†	Lat^†	Amp/Lat	CS^{^}
ON	60%	52%	44%	69%	60%	57%	77%	40%
Non-ON	19%	11%	13%	22%	24%	30%	45%^*	9%

GCIPLT: ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness, RNFLT: retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, TRNFLT: temporal RNFLT, Amp: multifocal visual evoked potential amplitude, Lat: multifocal visual evoked potential latency, CS: contrast sensitivity.

^§

Abnormal when < 5% of the age-matched machine-norm.

^†

Abnormal based on our previously established ‘cluster criteria’ for the probability plots (95% specificity) (Laron et al., 2009).

^{^}

Based on < 5% of our lab normal (Narayanan et al., 2015b).

In non-ON, more eyes showed abnormality on mfVEP (45%) than OCT (22%, p < 0.0005).