Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Dev Biol. 2018 Jun 27;444(Suppl 1):S237–S251. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.06.018

Table 1.

Molecular weight analysis of full-length Cad6B and Cad6B NTFs generated in vitro and in vivo^*

			Molecular Weight in kDa (Mean)

		Experiments (n)	PNGase F −	PNGase F +
Protein	Source	Experiments (n)	(untreated)	(treated)	Difference
Full-length Cad6B ( # in Fig. 2)	In vivo	2	122	106	16
	In vitro	1	135	113	22
	In vivo	2	95	80	15
Cad6B L-NTF ( + in Fig. 2)	Rec. L-NTF-HA (In vivo)	1	84	74	10
	In vitro	4	88	71	17
	Rec. L-NTF (In vitro)	1	92	73	19
	Rec. L-NTF-HA (In vitro)	1	93	72	21
	In vivo	1	83	70	13
Cad6B S-NTF ( ^* in Fig. 2)	Rec. S-NTF-HA (In vivo)	1	70	61	9
	In vitro	3	70	56	14
	Rec. S-NTF (In vitro)	1	71	59	12
	Rec. S-NTF-HA (In vitro)	1	72	62	10

^*

All analyses were performed on 7−10% SDS-PAGE gels.