Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 28.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2011 Sep 27;42(5):1081–1089. doi: 10.1017/S003329171100198X

Table 2.

Latent class model for conduct disorder (CD) symptoms with five classes

Symptom Class 1: No CD Class 2: Rule violations Class 3: Deceit/theft Class 4: Aggressive Class 5: Severe
Bullying 0.017 0.223 0.192 0.537 0.616
Initiates physical fights 0.001 0.081 0.001 0.474 0.522
Uses a weapon in a fight 0.002 0.021 0.022 0.151 0.347
Cruel to people 0.008 0.042 0.137 0.294 0.466
Cruel to animals 0.004 0.013 0.102 0.099 0.185
Steals with confrontation 0 0.006 0.001 0.003 0.091
Forced sexa 5/19297 = 0.0003 0 0 0 2/207 = 0.0097
Fire setting 0.001 0.009 0.088 0.034 0.263
Damages property 0.003 0.026 0.173 0.1 0.572
Stays out late 0.006 0.564 0.023 0.038 0.549
Runs away from home 0.009 0.347 0.102 0.104 0.41
Truancy 0.014 0.533 0.049 0.032 0.529
Lying 0.009 0.188 0.237 0.245 0.647
Steals without confrontation 0.07 0.273 0.749 0.467 0.907
Prevalence of classb, n (%) 19369 (89.75) 458 (1.99) 1156 (5.87) 298 (1.47) 208 (0.92)
Prevalence of CD in class, n (%) 0(0) 89 (19.14) 140 (12.98) 92 (34.24) 121 (56.96)
Median (IQR) age of onset of CD N.A. 12.13 12.07 11.83 11.77
(10.11–12.72) (9.35–12.70) (9.52–12.90) (8.62–12.83)

IQR, Interquartile range.

a

Forced sex had very low prevalence and was not used to estimate the latent class analysis model. Table shows the prevalence of forced sex among people classified into each class according to responses on the remaining symptoms.

b

Prevalence based on classification by posterior probability of class membership.