Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 14;14(12):e1006258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006258

Table 1. Prediction metrics on held out data for the best performing gradient boosted decision trees model.

Antibiotic TN FP FN TP S.PRC S.RCL R.PRC R.RCL S.FSc R.FSc ACC
AMP 24 5 5 118 0.83 0.96 0.83 0.96 0.83 0.96 0.93
AMX 80 8 15 115 0.84 0.93 0.91 0.89 0.87 0.91 0.89
AMC 221 34 29 52 0.89 0.60 0.87 0.64 0.87 0.62 0.81
CTZ 309 4 13 50 0.96 0.92 0.99 0.80 0.97 0.85 0.95
CTX 281 5 6 66 0.98 0.93 0.98 0.922 0.98 0.92 0.97
CXM 273 11 24 68 0.92 0.86 0.96 0.74 0.94 0.79 0.91
CET 38 12 17 85 0.70 0.88 0.76 0.83 0.72 0.85 0.81
GEN 316 1 11 48 0.97 0.98 0.99 0.81 0.98 0.89 0.97
TBM 104 3 7 38 0.94 0.92 0.98 0.84 0.95 0.89 0.93
TMP 73 7 10 62 0.88 0.90 0.91 0.86 0.90 0.88 0.89
CIP 281 10 16 69 0.95 0.87 0.97 0.81 0.95 0.84 0.93

TN: true negatives, FN: false negatives, FP: false positives, TP: true positives, PRC: precision, RCL: recall, S: susceptibility, R: resistance, ACC: accuracy for resistance.