Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 28.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun 10;217(5):568.e1–568.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.005

Table 1.

Demographics and baseline characteristics of women randomized to delayed and immediate contraceptive implant initiation

Variables Total (n = 205), n, % Immediate start (n = 103), n, % Delayed start (n = 102), n, %
Age, y (mean/SD) 26.9 (5.4) 26.3 (5.2) 27.5 (5.5)
Marital status
    Single 4 (2.0) 3 (2.9) 1 (1.0)
    Married 98 (47.8) 52 (50.5) 46(45.1)
    Divorced/separated/widowed 3(1.5) 0(0) 3 (2.9)
    In a relationship 100(48.8) 48 (4.6) 52 (51.0)
Age of partner, y (mean/SD)a 32.9 (7.9) 32.4 (8.3) 33.4 (7.5)
Education completed
    No formal schooling 6 (2.9) 2(1.9) 4 (3.9)
    Some primary school 64 (31.2) 33 (32.0) 31 (30.4)
    Some secondary school 115 (56.1) 60 (58.3) 55 (53.9)
    Some university 20 (9.8) 8 (7.8) 12 (11.8)
Number of living children
    0 29 (14.1) 16(15.5) 13 (12.7)
    1 13 (6.3) 8 (7.8) 5 (4.9)
    2 52 (25.4) 29 (28.2) 23 (22.5)
    ≥3 111 (54.1) 50 (48.5) 61 (59.8)
Age at first pregnancy, y (mean/SD) 18.9(3.2) 18.7(3.0) 19.1 (3.3)
Cesarean delivery 68 (33.2) 37 (35.9) 31 (30.4)
Delivery of multiplesb 7 (3.4) 1 (1.0) 6 (5.9)
Prior implant use 15 (7.3) 5 (4.9) 10(9.9)
Time traveled to Mulago, min, (mean/SD) 72.4 (41.8) 69.5 (38.7) 75.4 (44.6)
a

Seventeen participants reported age of partner was unknown

b

Six sets of twins and 1 set of triplets.

Averbach et al. Immediate initiation of postpartum contraceptive implants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017.