Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 28.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun 10;217(5):568.e1–568.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.005

Table 2.

Utilization after immediate vs delayed postpartum initiation of contraceptive implants at 3 and 6 months (intent to treat)

Variables Immediate Delayed Risk difference (95% Cl) P value
3 months postpartum (n = 91),% (n = 85, %)
    Using implant at 3 mo 90 (98.9) 35 (41.2) 57.7 (47.05—68.40) < .001
    Using implant or other modern method at 3 monthsa 91 (100) 44 (51.8) 48.2 (37.61—58.86) < .001
    Using implant or other highly effective method at 3 monthsb 91 (100) 42 (49.4) 50.6 (39.96—61.22) < .001
6 months postpartum (n = 96), % (n = 87), %
    Using implant at 6 mo 93 (96.9) 59 (67.8) 29.1 (18.64—39.47) < .001
    Using implant or other modern method at 6 moa 95 (99.0) 75 (86.2) 12.8 (5.22—20.28) .001
    Using implant or other highly effective method at 6 mob 94 (97.9) 70 (80.5) 17.4 (8.65—26.27) .001
    Pregnancies at 6 mo 0(0) 2 (2.3) 2.3 (0.01—5.58) .230

Data are presented as n (percentage) analyzed with a X2 or Fisher exact test.

CI, confidence interval; IUD, intrauterine device.

a

Modern methods include implant pill, injection, IUDs, condoms, sterilization (and lactational amenorrhea at 3 months)

b

Highly effective methods include implant, pill, injection, IUDs, and sterilization.

Averbach et al. Immediate initiation of postpartum contraceptive implants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017.