Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jun 28;1442(1):79–90. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13914

Table 2.

Dynamic histomorphometric studies showing load-induced changes in femoral midshaft of 2-week loaded vs. non-loaded wildtype and Panx1−/− bones.

Parameters Wildtype Panx1−/−
non-loaded
(n = 5)
loaded
(n = 5)
non-loaded
(n = 4)
loaded
(n = 4)

Ps.MS/BS (%) 17.5 ± 3.9 29.9 ± 4.9** 23.7 ± 4.9 15.5 ± 1.2#
Ps.MAR (µm/day) 1.4 ± 0.2 1.6 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.2
Ps.BFR/BS (µm3/µm2/day) 0.25 ± 0.1 0.47 ± 0.1** 0.34 ± 0.07 0.20 ± 0.02#
Ec.MS/BS (%) 34.7 ± 8.7 32.9 ± 6.2 34.6 ± 4.9 40.1 ± 2.2
Ec.MAR (µm/day) 1.6 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.3 1.4 ± 0.1
Ec.BFR/BS (µm3/µm2/day) 0.58 ± 0.3 0.53 ± 0.3 0.38 ± 0.13 0.56 ± 0.06
**

P<0.01, comparisons with respect to age-matched non-loaded wildtype;

#

P<0.05, loaded vs. age-matched non-loaded Panx1−/−; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test.

Periosteal mineralizing surface (Ps.Ms/Bs), periosteal mineral apposition rate (Ps.MAR), periosteal bone formation rate (Ps.BFR/BS), endocortical mineralizing surface (Ec.Ms/Bs), endocortical mineral apposition rate (Ec.MAR), and endocortical bone formation rate (Ec.BFR/BS) are presented as means ± SD.