Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 26;7(6):643–655.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2018.10.011

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Short Duration Spikes to High Temperature Affect VIN3 Expression

(A) Temperature conditions given daily for 4 weeks (left) and then on day of sampling (right). Plants were grown in 20°C (night) or 22°C (day) 16-hr photoperiod for 1 week and then transferred to the conditions shown on the left. Dark background indicates nighttime (8-hr photoperiod).

(B) VIN3 spliced expression during the day of sampling, sampled every 3 hr over a 12-hr period as shown. The green background indicates the time of the high temperature spike in the midday spike conditions. n = 1–9; average > 6.

(C) VIN3 unspliced expression from experiment in (B). n = 1–9; average > 6.

(D) VIN3 expression after 4 weeks cold in indicated conditions. “Before” refers to samples taken at 18:30 on sampling day, in the conditions indicated. “After” refers to samples that after 4 weeks cold in indicated conditions were further treated with, first, a further 4 days in the conditions indicated and then transferred in the afternoon (before dark) to constant 8°C conditions for approximately 24 hr before sampling at 18:30. n = 2–8; average = 4.4.

(E) FLC expression averaged over all the time points of sampling day after 4 weeks cold. Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s post hoc test between midday spike, night spike and spike memory (conditions with similar VIN3 expression for the 4 weeks of the treatment to test for VIN3-independent effect only) gives p<0.05 significant difference ( in plot) between night spike and midday spike and between night spike and spike memory (no significant difference between midday spike and spike memory). Boxplots show median and 25th and 75th percentiles of the samples. Ends of whiskers show maximum and minimum values. n = 12–38; average > 30. In all cases, circle and bars show mean and standard error, respectively. RNA levels normalized to UBC, PP2A.

See also Figures S3 and S4.