Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 26;21(4):453–462. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e62

Table 1. The correlation of CEDM and CEMRI final assessments with histopathologic results.

graphic file with name jbc-21-453-i001.jpg

CEDM=contrast-enhanced digital mammography; CEMRI=contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; TP=true positive; FN=false negative; FP=false positive; TN=true negative.

*2: invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), 4: ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); 1: IDC, 4: DCIS; 2: high-risk benign lesions, 7: other benign lesions, 1: no suspicious finding at 2nd ultrasonography (US); §1: DCIS; 3: high-risk benign lesions, 4: other benign lesions, 1: no suspicious finding at 2nd US; 1: IDC, 1: invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), 2: DCIS; **1: IDC, 1: ILC, 3: DCIS; ††3: high-risk benign lesions, 9: other benign lesions, 2: no suspicious finding at 2nd US; ‡‡1: IDC; §§5: high-risk benign lesions, 4: other benign lesions, 3: no suspicious finding at 2nd US.