Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2018 Nov 22;396:138–153. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.11.021

Table D1:

Comparisons of morphology measures across method

Method Main Effects (eGFP vs. Golgi-Cox)
Apical total length F(1,29) = 0.377, p = 0.544
Apical number of branches F(1,29) = 3.259, p = 0.081
Apical average length F(1,29) = 0.641, p = 0.430
Apical tortuosity F(1,29) = 0.024, p = 0.879
Apical total arbor path F(1,29) = 29.326, p < 0.001*
Apical length (Sholl) F(1,29) = 5.592, p < 0.025*
Apical branch intersections (Sholl) F(1,29) = 4.245, p < 0.048*
Basal total length F(1,29) = 0.158, p = 0.694
Basal number of branches F(1,29) = 18.458, p < 0.001*
Basal average length F(1,29) = 4.454, p = 0.044*
Basal tortuosity F(1,29) = 2.013, p = 0.167
Basal total arbor path F(1,29) = 70.096, p < 0.001*
Basal length (Sholl) F(1,29) = 37.528, p < 0.001*
Basal branch intersections (Sholl) F(1,29) = 40.150, p < 0.001*