Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2018 Nov 22;396:138–153. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.11.021

Table H1:

eGFP Annulus Level Main Effects

Post Hoc Comparisons Analysis
Apical length 1 vs. 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7, p < 0.001; 2 vs. 6 and 2 vs. 7, p < 0.001; 3 vs. 6 and 3
vs. 7, p < 0.001; 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 5, p = 0.001; 2 vs. 3, p = 0.029; 2 vs. 4, p
= 0.015; 3 vs. 5, p = 0.002; 4 vs. 6, p = 0.016; all others nonsignificant
Basal length 1 vs. 2, 3, and 4, p < 0.001; 2 vs. 3 and 2 vs. 4, p < 0.001; all others
nonsignificant
Apical branch intersections 1 vs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, p < 0.001; 2 vs. 5, 6, and 7, p < 0.001; 3 vs. 6 and
3 vs. 7, p < 0.001; 4 vs. 6, p < 0.001; 2 vs. 3, p = 0.010; 2 vs. 4 and 5 vs. 6,
p = 0.008; 3 vs. 4, p = 0.036; 3 vs. 5 and 4 vs. 5, p = 0.001; 4 vs. 7, p =
0.003; 4 vs. 8, p = 0.007; 4 vs. 9, p = 0.022; all others nonsignificant
Basal branch intersections 1 vs. 2, 3, and 4, p < 0.001; 2 vs. 3 and 2 vs. 4, p < 0.001; all others
nonsignificant