Abstract
Background:
Facial palsy is a devastating condition potentially amenable to rehabilitation by functional electrical stimulation. Herein, a novel paradigm for unilateral facial reanimation via an implantable neuroprosthetic device is proposed and its feasibility demonstrated in a live rodent model. The paradigm comprises use of healthy-side electromyography activity as control inputs to a system whose outputs are neural stimuli to effect symmetric facial displacements. The vexing issue of suppressing undesirable activity resulting from aberrant neural regeneration (i.e., synkinesis) or nerve transfer procedures is addressed using proximal neural blockade.
Methods:
Epimysial and nerve cuff electrode arrays were implanted in the faces of Wistar rats. Stimuli were delivered to evoke blinks and whisks of various durations and amplitudes. The dynamic relation between electromyography signals and facial displacements were modelled, and model predictions compared against measured displacements. Optimal parameters to achieve facial nerve blockade by means of high-frequency alternating current were determined, and safety of continuous delivery assessed.
Results:
Electrode implantation was well-tolerated. Blinks and whisks of tunable amplitudes and durations were evoked by controlled variation of neural stimuli parameters. Facial displacements predicted from electromyography input modelling matched those observed with a variance-accounted-for exceeding 96%. Effective and reversible facial nerve blockade in awake behaving animals was achieved, without detrimental effect noted from long-term continual use.
Conclusions:
Proof-of-principal of rehabilitation of hemifacial palsy by means of a neuroprosthetic device has been demonstrated. The use of proximal neural blockade coupled with distal functional electrical stimulation may have relevance to rehabilitation of other peripheral motor nerve deficits.
Background
Facial palsy is a devastating clinical condition with functional, esthetic, and communication sequelae (1–18), whose ultimate clinical course yields flaccid hemi-facial paralysis (Fig. 1A), post-paralytic facial palsy (Fig. 1B), or combinations thereof. Dynamic reanimation in hemi-facial palsy is principally limited to smile restoration through nerve or functional muscle transfers. Commonly, smile is reanimated using non-emotional trigeminal motor tracts requiring a conscious bite effort that provides volitional but non-spontaneous smile, together with undesired prandial activation. Reanimation outcomes are further limited in that no approach to dynamic restoration of brow elevation, blink, lip pucker, or lower lip movement has achieved consistent success.
Fig 1. Hemifacial palsy.
A – Left-sided flaccid facial paralysis, with severe paralytic lagophthalmos, lack of smile, and mid-facial ptosis. B – Left-sided post-paralytic facial nerve syndrome, with severe ocular and mid-facial synkinesis and smile restriction. This condition is the result of aberrant regeneration of the facial nerve following high-grade insult, examples of which include severe Bell’s palsy, Lyme disease, Ramsay Hunt syndrome, and extirpation of cerebellopontine angle tumors.
Heretofore, the most significant barrier to more effective facial reanimation strategies in both flaccid and post-paralytic facial palsy settings has been a lack of effective control mechanisms for denervated or aberrantly re-innervated facial muscles. Recent technologic advances in signal processing techniques, implantable neural and muscular electrodes, and implantable application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) have led to remarkable breakthroughs in the design and control of prosthetic limbs, devices to restore hearing and other senses, devices to aid gait in the setting of central nervous system disorders, and devices to treat obstructive sleep apnea (19–26). This paper presents a novel implantable neuroprosthetic device (NPD) paradigm for functional electric stimulation (FES) reanimation of the hemi-paretic face (Fig. 2). This paradigm addresses not only the challenge of evoking appropriate facial movements, but also the vexing issue of suppressing undesirable facial activity resulting from aberrant neural regeneration or nerve transfer procedures. The system uses healthy-side electromyography (EMG) signals as the control inputs to a NPD, whose outputs stimulate nerve branches on the paretic side to effect paired muscle contraction (Fig. 3); concurrently applied high-frequency alternating current (HFAC) stimulation provides proximal neural blockade to prevent undesired physiologic muscle activation. Proof-of-principle of this paradigm is demonstrated in a rodent facial nerve model in a series of experiments, whereby implanted nerve cuff electrodes (NCEs) and epimysial electrode arrays (EEAs) are employed to deliver neural stimuli and capture facial muscle EMG activity.
Fig 2. Neuroprosthetic device for hemi-facial reanimation.
Implanted epimysial electrode arrays record EMG signals of healthy side facial musculature, which serve as inputs to an open-loop functional electrical stimulation control algorithm embedded into an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), that outputs concordant stimulatory signals to distal nerve branches via implanted nerve cuff electrodes on the diseased side. A constant high-frequency alternating current (HFAC) neural blockade signal is applied proximally on the affected side to prevent undesirable physiologic muscle activation.
Fig 3. Proposed mathematical models for control of a neuroprosthetic device for hemifacial reanimation.
Top – An input EMG signal g(t) is modeled to an output displacement y(t) on the healthy-side of the face using a Hammerstein system. Middle – An input electrical neural stimulus u(t) is modeled to the output displacement y(t) using an NLN structure). Bottom – An input EMG signal from one side of the face is modeled to an output neural stimulus that reproduces the displacement on the contralateral side by coupling the ERS with the inverse of the SRS.
Methods
Overall approach:
A three part series of experiments was performed (Table 1) using a rodent facial nerve model (27–38). Rat blink was used as a surrogate for human blink, while rat whisking (that occurs at different frequencies and amplitudes) was used as a surrogate for continuous proportional control of human facial muscle contractions responsible for movements such as smile or brow elevation. Implanted EEAs were used to record healthy-side facial muscle activity, while NCEs were used to deliver proximal neural blockade and distal stimulatory signals. Long-term tolerance of implanted electrodes and quality of EMG recordings were assessed, and the capacity to evoke facial displacements of varying amplitudes and durations evaluated. Dynamic relationships between EMG activity recorded from rat facial muscles and facial movements were modeled. Optimal neural blockade signal parameters to prevent synkinetic neuronal discharge while permitting distal branch FES were determined. The safety of continual delivery of HFAC to the facial nerve was assessed over the long-term.
Table 1.
Live-rodent experiments
| Part | Experiment | # |
|---|---|---|
| 1 – Model establishment | Evoked facial displacements | 5 |
| Evoked EMG | 5 | |
| 2 – Control system | Modelling of EMG to facial displacements | 5 |
| 3 – Neural blockade | Efficacy | 5 |
| Safety | 5 |
Part 1: Establishment of a Rodent Model for Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Facial Nerve
Head fixation and conditioning:
Ten female Wistar rats, 200–250 g, had titanium head fixation devices (HFDs) implanted and were conditioned to head fixation testing as previously described (28–46). Briefly, rats were trained daily for two weeks to acclimate to handling and restraint. HFDs were then implanted under general anesthesia using ketamine HCl and dexmedetomidine HCl (50 mg/kg: 0.5 mg/kg) via a midline scalp incision. A subperiosteal plane was developed over the calvarium, the sterilized implant secured to the calvarium using titanium screws, and the incision closed in a single layer (Fig. 4A). Daily head restraint training began two weeks later until animals tolerated ten minute-long sessions. A customized resin top-hat enclosure to house the distal ends of electrode leads with their connectors was fabricated and secured to the HFD (Fig. 4B). This enclosure provided protection and ease of access for subsequent recording and stimulation experiments
Fig 4. Rat head fixation device (HFD) and electrode lead enclosure.
A – Typical healthy interface of the percutaneous osseointegrated titanium HFD and scalp. B – Top-hat-style resin enclosure secured to the HFD with nuts and bolts (inset: open enclosure demonstrating electrode leads and pin connector).
Electrode implantation:
Once conditioned, electrodes were implanted in the animals during a second procedure under general anesthesia. A 1 cm incision was made in the left cheek and flaps elevated immediately superior to the plane of the facial nerve. In five animals (group 1a), NCEs (custom bipolar design, MicroProbes for Life Sciences, Gaithersburg, MD, Fig. 5, top) were implanted around intact and meticulously dissected zygomatic and buccal branches of the facial nerve. In five other animals (group 1b), blunt dissection was carried deep to the center of the whisker pad musculature for EEA positioning (custom bipolar design, Ripple LLC, Salt Lake City, UT, Fig. 5, bottom) concurrent with NCE placement around the buccal branch of the facial nerve. Electrodes were secured to the deep facial fascia overlying the masseter muscle using 5–0 polypropylene sutures, with leads tunneled in the subcutaneous plane to exit the skin over the occiput. Lead terminals were soldered to a pin connector (A11365–001, Omnetics Connector Corp, Minneapolis, MN) and housed in the customized top-hat enclosure (Figs. 4B and 6).
Fig 5. Electrodes.
Silicone-sheathed nerve cuff with platinum-iridium electrodes (NCE, MicroProbes) (above) and a two-channel highly flexible conductive polymer electrode array (CPE, Ripple LLC) (below).
Fig 6. Electrode implantation.
A – NCEs are implanted on zygomatic (arrow) and buccal (*) branches of the FN. B – EEAs are implanted underlying the orbicularis oculi (arrow) and whisker pad musculature (arrowhead) under general anesthesia.
Quantitative whisker and eyelid displacement recording:
The hardware and software used for monitoring whisking movements was adapted from Bermejo et al (28–33, 47). A single whisker (C-1) on each side of the head was entubulated using a polyacrylamide tube to increase detectability. Whisker displacements were then independently tracked using commercial laser micrometer pairs (MetraLight, Santa Mateo CA). Blinks were detected using infrared sensors to measure light reflectivity from the cornea and eyelids as described by Thompson et al (48). Computer-controlled air valves were used to deliver corneal air puffs and scented air flows to elicit blink and whisking behavior, respectively.
Evoked stimuli:
While under general anesthesia, animals in Group 1a received varying neural stimuli to zygomatic and buccal branch NCEs, with concurrent tracking of blink and whisker displacements. Animals in Group 1b received neural stimuli to the buccal branch NCE with concurrent capture of whisker pad EMG responses from implanted EEAs. A commercial electrophysiology system (CyberAmp 380 signal conditioner, Digidata 1322A digitizer, pCLAMP 10 software, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) combined with analog stimulus isolator units (Analog Stimulus Isolator Model 2200, ADInstruments, Colorado Springs, CO) were used for stimulation and EMG signal acquisition. Neural stimuli comprised trains of current-controlled, charge-balanced square wave pulses (pulse width 0.4 ms, train durations 0.4 ms – 100 ms, repetition rates 1 – 2 Hz, peak-to-peak amplitudes 0.1 – 2 mA). EMG signals were measured with a differential amplifier with pre-filter gain of 10, high-pass filter at 10 Hz, low pass filter at 1000 Hz, notch filter at 60 Hz and post-filter gain of 100. EMG signals were then sampled at 10 kHz with 16-bit resolution, concurrent with whisker and blink displacement signals.
Part 2: Establishing Feasibility of Epimysial EMG as FES Control
Modeling of EMG activity to whisker displacement:
Herein, the healthy-side EMG activity of the whisker pad musculature, as captured using implanted EEAs, were used as inputs and the resulting whisker displacements as the output. Animals from Group 1b above were placed under general anesthesia, and fixed stimuli delivered to the buccal branch NCE (constant current charge balanced square wave, peak-to-peak stimuli 0.5 mA, pulse width 0.4 ms, train width 1.2 ms, repetition rate 1 Hz). The resulting whisker pad EMG responses and C-1 whisker displacements were measured. Methods for Hammerstein system identification described by Jalaleddini and Kearney (49, 50) were used to identify models relating recorded EMG signals to measured whisker displacements in MATLAB (v2015b, The MathWorks Inc, Natick, MA). Muscle was treated as a nonlinear biological system where the relation between neural activation and force was modeled as the cascade of a static nonlinearity followed by a dynamic linear system (51, 52) (Fig. 3, top).
Part 3: Establishing Neural Blockade Effectiveness and Safety
Determination of optimal HFAC parameters and efficacy:
Three animals were implanted with three NCEs on the left buccal branch of the facial nerve, and the animal placed in a laser micrometer field to track evoked whisker displacements. Cathodic pulses from a pulse generator (S88, Grass Instruments, Astro-Med Inc., West Warwick, RI) coupled to stimulus isolators to achieve biphasic constant-current pulses (0.5 mA, 50 μs pulse width) were delivered to proximal (at 1 Hz) and distal (at 1.5 Hz) NCEs. High-frequency alternating current (constant-voltage sine wave) was delivered to the central NCE using a function generator (FG085 Kit, JYE Tech, Guilin, Guangxi, China). The peak-to-peak amplitudes (0 – 10 V) and frequency (2 kHz – 40 kHz) were varied to determine optimal blockade parameters. Two further animals, with HFDs implanted and conditioned to head fixation as described above, were implanted with NCEs to the buccal branch and zygomatic branches on the left side. Animals were placed in head fixation for quantitative tracking of awake behavioral whisking, with concurrent application of HFAC and distal FES neural stimuli to generate whisks and blinks.
Establishing safety of continuous HFAC delivery:
Once optimal HFAC parameters were identified, five animals underwent HFD device implantation and restraint training, followed by single bipolar NCE implantation to the buccal branch of the left facial nerve. The marginal-mandibular branch was resected bilaterally to eliminate its contribution to whisking. Beginning one week after NCE implantation, HFAC was delivered continuously for four hours, five days per week, for two weeks (total 40 hours) under general anesthesia. Three minute sessions of awake behavioral whisking assessment were recorded at baseline, after NCE implantation, and preceding each HFAC delivery session. The ratio of the whisking amplitudes between HFAC-blocked and non-blocked sides was tracked for each animal over time.
Results
Part 1: Establishment of a Rodent Model for Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Facial Nerve
Animals tolerated top-hat enclosures and electrode implantations for periods exceeding 40 days prior to scheduled euthanasia, without infection or marked foreign-body reaction despite the subcutaneous exit point of the electrode leads atop the head (See Video 1, which demonstrates Free roaming rat with implanted electrodes. Electrodes were positioned on facial nerve branches and musculature as demonstrated in Fig 6, with leads tunneled subcutaneously to exit the skin atop the cranium and secured within a resin enclosure bolted to a percutaneous osseointegrated titanium cranial plate (as shown in Fig. 4), available in the “Related Videos” section of the Full-Text article on PRSJournal.com or, for Ovid users, available at INSERT HYPER LINK) (Video Graphic 1). Robust evoked epimysial EMG responses were recorded from the implanted epimysial electrodes, with excellent signal-to-noise ratios (Fig. 7A) throughout this time. Electrical stimulation evoked blinks of varying durations and whisks of varying amplitudes in all NCE implanted animals (Fig. 7B) (See Video 2, which demonstrates Evoked blink and whisk in a live anesthetized rat by means of electrical stimulation of specific facial nerve branches via implanted nerve cuff electrodes. Nerve cuff electrodes were positioned around intact zygomatic and buccal branches of the facial nerve (as demonstrated in Fig. 6A), available in the “Related Videos” section of the Full-Text article on PRSJournal.com or, for Ovid users, available at INSERT HYPER LINK) (Video Graphic 2).
Video Graphic 1.
See Video 1, which demonstrates Free roaming rat with implanted electrodes. Electrodes were positioned on facial nerve branches and musculature as demonstrated in Fig 6, with leads tunneled subcutaneously to exit the skin atop the cranium and secured within a resin enclosure bolted to a percutaneous osseointegrated titanium cranial plate (as shown in Fig. 4), available in the “Related Videos” section of the Full-Text article on PRSJournal.com or, for Ovid users, available at INSERT HYPER LINK.
Fig 7. Evoked responses.
Evoked EMG response captured using EEAs and elicited blink and whisker response from various neural stimuli delivered using NCEs of the types proposed herein on a live rat model. A – Noise-free differential compound muscle action potentials (CMAP, bottom) underlying the whisker pad (electrode spacing of 5 mm, initial gain of 10, sampling rate 10 kHz, AC input-coupled at 10Hz, low-pass filtered at 400 Hz, total gain 1000, stimuli shown above). B – Eyelid response (top) to biphasic train stimuli at 1 Hz of constant amplitude and increasing duration demonstrates ability to evoke faster or slower blinks, while whisker response (bottom) at 2 Hz stimulus of constant duration and increasing amplitude demonstrates ability to evoke whisks of lesser or greater amplitude.
Video Graphic 2.
See Video 2, which demonstrates Evoked blink and whisk in a live anesthetized rat by means of electrical stimulation of specific facial nerve branches via implanted nerve cuff electrodes. Nerve cuff electrodes were positioned around intact zygomatic and buccal branches of the facial nerve (as demonstrated in Fig. 6A), available in the “Related Videos” section of the Full-Text article on PRSJournal.com or, for Ovid users, available at INSERT HYPER LINK.
Part 2: Establishing Feasibility of Epimysial EMG as FES Control
Hammerstein modelling of the relation between epimysial EMG signals (obtained from the undersurface of the whisker pad musculature) to evoked whisks movement demonstrated excellent predictive capacity (Fig. 8), with the model accounting for more than 96% of the variance in whisker displacements.
Fig 8.
Modelling EMG activity to whisker displacement. Top – An impulse response function (IRF) indicates a clear dynamic relationship between an EEA-captured EMG input (implanted underlying the whisker pad) and recorded whisker position. Bottom – The model demonstrated a variance accounted for (VAF) in excess of 96% (below).
Part 3: Establishing Neural Blockade Effectiveness and Safety
A 30 kHz sine-wave with a peak-to-peak amplitude of 5V was found to be optimal for inducing blockade of evoked and spontaneous whisking activity in the rat using the customized NCE. In anesthetized animals, this achieved a ~90% reduction in evoked whisking amplitude, without restriction of distal neuromuscular excitability (Fig. 9A, B). In awake animals, a similar reduction in behavioral whisking power was observed between blocked and normal sides (Fig. 9C) (See Video 3, which demonstrates Neural blockade of physiologic whisking activity in the live awake rat, with concurrent electrical stimulation to evoke blink and whisk via implanted nerve cuff electrodes. Nerve cuff electrodes were positioned around intact zygomatic and buccal branches of the facial nerve (as demonstrated in Fig 6A). Neural blockade was achieved by delivery of high-frequency alternating current (as demonstrated in Fig. 9B), available in the “Related Videos” section of the Full-Text article on PRSJournal.com or, for Ovid users, available at INSERT HYPER LINK) (Video Graphic 3) with HFAC application. No differences were observed in whisking amplitudes between sides with prolonged unilateral daily delivery of HFAC (Fig. 10). Full results of this series of experiments will be reported in more detail in subsequent publications.
Fig 9. High-frequency alternating current (HFAC) neural blockade of whisker movement in an anaesthetized and awake rat.
A – Three signals are delivered to the buccal branch of the FN (controls whisking): a proximal stimulation at 1 Hz, HFAC, and a distal stimulation at 1.5 Hz, with parameters as shown in (B). As is seen in (A), HFAC delivery results in a ~90% reduction in whisker amplitude while not affecting the ability to stimulate the nerve distally. B – Stimulation and blockade parameters and NCE positions are shown. C – Constant HFAC is delivered to the left buccal branch using an NCE from t=30s to t = 240s (above). Power spectra demonstrate near equal left and right-sided whisking power during the periods immediately before and after HFAC, with a dramatic drop on the left side seen with HFAC (below).
Video Graphic 3.
See Video 3, which demonstrates Neural blockade of physiologic whisking activity in the live awake rat, with concurrent electrical stimulation to evoke blink and whisk via implanted nerve cuff electrodes. Nerve cuff electrodes were positioned around intact zygomatic and buccal branches of the facial nerve (as demonstrated in Fig 6A). Neural blockade was achieved by delivery of high-frequency alternating current (as demonstrated in Fig. 9B), available in the “Related Videos” section of the Full-Text article on PRSJournal.com or, for Ovid users, available at INSERT HYPER LINK.
Fig 10. Prolonged high-frequency alternating current neural blockade delivery in the rat.
Relative maximal whisk amplitudes between left-face (implanted with NCEs on nerve controlling whisking with 4 hours of daily continuous HFAC delivery - see inset) and right-face (normal-side) demonstrate normal or stronger whisker displacements on the side to which HFAC was delivered (green bar approximates normal range).
Discussion
While the basic concept of using signals from the contralateral face to drive FES of paralyzed facial muscles has been demonstrated (53–63), prior work has not addressed critical issues relevant to the long-term implementation of this approach. Optimal FES of dysfunctional muscle requires three conditions; muscle must be neurotized, be capable of being stimulated in purposeful and timely fashion, and be devoid of undesirable activity. Neurotization of muscle prevents denervation atrophy and permits FES through neural stimulation without the need for direct muscle stimulation. Though direct muscle stimulation of denervated muscle may prevent atrophy, it requires delivery of high and potentially injurious stimulus amplitudes to evoke contractions (64–66). Such an approach is not feasible in the setting of facial palsy due to excessive power demands on an implanted NPD, coupled with regional nociceptive fiber activation that would result from the delivery of high stimulus amplitudes. In the setting of facial palsy, neurotization of facial muscles may occur spontaneously following neural insult, through interposition graft repair, or through nerve transfer. In cases of long-standing or congenital facial palsy, dynamic facial reanimation may be achieved by functional muscle transfer. Here we propose that muscle contraction be evoked through stimulation of distal native facial nerve branches (or transferred nerves) using electrically-shielded nerve cuff electrodes (NCEs). Such distal facial nerve branches to individual paired-muscles or functional muscle groups of the face are straightforward to access surgically. Likewise, in cases where nerve or muscle transfers are required for dynamic reanimation, nerve branches to the target muscle are readily accessible for cuff implantation at the time of reanimation surgery or during future re-exploration.
Dynamic reanimation of muscle requires an adequate control signal to effect desired movements at appropriate times. Use of myoelectric activity to reliably drive neuroprostheses has already been demonstrated (67, 68). Herein, we have demonstrated that electromyography (EMG) signals from contralateral, healthy facial muscles may be utilized as control signals to drive FES of the paretic hemi-face. Herein, EMG activity was captured through the use of implanted epimysial electrode arrays (EEAs), obviating the need for external sensors, and a clear mathematical relationship capable of predicting facial displacements from EMG inputs was demonstrated. Use of the contralateral healthy hemi-face for dynamic reanimation of unilateral facial paralysis is a natural choice, as the majority of expressions – especially positive expressions – are symmetric (69). The NPD proposed herein could evoke paired-muscle contraction without a conspicuous phase delay in movement onset between sides. Modern implantable ASICs achieve delays of 5 ms or better on signal receiving and stimulus transmitting arms, with sub-millisecond processing times for most FES applications. When coupled with typical delays on the order of 10 ms for physiologic transduction of the neural stimulus to effect myocyte depolarization, the maximum expected delay between healthy-side detected EMG activity – and subsequent muscular contraction – and paretic-side neural stimulation is on the order of 20 ms, below the ~33 ms threshold above which humans are able to detect asymmetric movement (70, 71).
While stimulation of desirable muscle activity is necessary for functional reanimation, concurrent inhibition of undesirable neural activity is often just as important. No prior work has addressed the vexing issue of how to prevent undesirable muscle activation from aberrantly regenerated axons (i.e. in the case of aberrantly regenerated native facial nerve) or from the normal functioning of transferred cranial nerves (e.g. prandial activation of muscle innervated by transfer of the masseteric branch of the trigeminal nerve). Herein, we describe for the first time the use of concurrent proximal application of high frequency alternating current (HFAC) over prolonged periods to prevent such undesired facial contractions. Delivery of HFAC to peripheral nerve trunks results in reversible induction of localized blockade of propagating action potentials, without impeding distal neuromuscular excitability (72–83); proximal application of HFAC to a motor nerve squelches physiologic activity while maintaining the capacity for distal FES. While there exists brief tetanic onset and offsets responses with HFAC application (72, 75, 84), such repeated responses would be avoided herein through continual proximal delivery of HFAC during waking hours concurrent with distal FES to drive expression. The device could also be implemented in ‘FES-only’ mode to allow physiologic action potentials to pass concurrent with evoked potentials, or ‘neural blockade-only’ mode to induce targeted flaccidity.
In contrast to a recent publication (58), the novelty of the work herein lies in (1) use of clinically-relevant biocompatible epimysial electrodes to capture EMG signals as opposed to transdermal wires, (2) use of clinically-relevant implantable neural cuffs to evoke facial displacements through neural as opposed to direct muscle stimulation via transdermal wires, (3) characterization of a mathematical model capable of predicting whisker displacements from EMG signals as opposed to correlation of signal envelopes, (4) recognition of the clinically-vexing issue of undesirable physiologic neural activity that occurs with aberrantly innervated muscle, and (5) proposing and demonstrating the long-term efficacy of proximal HFAC application concurrent with distal FES as a solution.
Though the ultimate goal of reanimation is to restore dynamic function of the entire facial musculature, restoration of three symmetric facial movements alone – brow elevation, blink, and smile – would dramatically improve clinical outcomes. Such an approach would require implantation of only three miniature EEAs and NCEs coupled to an implanted ASIC, and would represent a paradigm shift in management. The proposed NPD could also be readily utilized in patients undergoing, or who have previously undergone successful trigeminal nerve-driven smile reanimation to re-establish spontaneity. In this realization, smile activation – resulting from the contraction of transferred free functional muscle or native facial musculature driven by the nerve-to-masseter – could be controlled through EMG signals from healthy side zygomaticus major activity through the FES paradigm proposed herein, with elimination of highly undesirable prandial activation through proximal HFAC neural blockade (Fig. 11). Similar to cochlear implant programming, stimulation parameters could be tuned wirelessly as innervation and tissue response to implanted electrodes reach a steady state.
Fig 11. Proposed paradigm for reanimation of spontaneity of trigeminal nerve-driven smile in the setting of free gracilis transfer.
An implanted epimysial electrode array captures contralateral healthy zygomaticus major EMG activity with leads tunneled subcutaneously to an implanted application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC). Output leads from the ASIC connect to a nerve cuff electrode positioned around the nerve-to-gracilis, which itself is coapted to the nerve-to-masseter. A proximal neural blockade signal is delivered to eliminate undesired prandial activation of the muscle, concurrent with distal functional electrical stimulation signals from the ASIC to reanimate symmetric spontaneous and volitional smile. A similar paradigm could be employed for reanimation of smile spontaneity following nerve-to-masseter transfer to targeted facial branches driving smile (i.e., the “V-VII” transfer, which is indicated in cases where native facial musculature remains receptive to reinnervation).
This work has demonstrated the feasibility of employing epimysial EMG signals from healthy-side facial musculature captured using biocompatible and fully-implantable miniature electrodes as a means for control of a FES paradigm to drive reanimation of symmetric expression in hemi-facial palsy. The capacity to effect independent facial movements of varied duration and amplitudes by means of FES of distal facial nerve branches was established. Importantly, the efficacy and safety of proximal neural blockade by means of continuous HFAC delivery as a means to extinguish undesirable facial muscle activity arising from the intrinsic activity of damaged or transferred nerves has been proposed and demonstrated.
The combination of proximal HFAC with distal FES to achieve total extrinsic control over a motor nerve has clinical implications elsewhere where undesirable activity of a peripheral nerve resulting from disease, injury, or nerve transfer exists. Future work will seek to study this paradigm over the long term using a fully implantable miniaturized ASIC currently under development. Beyond FES applications, application of HFAC to peripheral nerves might ultimately prove efficacious for management of spastic disorders and painful neuropathies, as focal blockade of action potential propagation occurs for efferent and afferent pathways (85).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Funding Support: This study was supported by NIH NINDS 5R01NS071067-07.
Footnotes
Financial Disclosures: Two authors (N.J. and T.A.H.) hold a patent on the methods and systems described herein (WO2017124019A1).
A portion of this work was presented in oral format at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Peripheral Nerve, Scottsdale, AZ (Jan 15th – 17th, 2016).
References
- 1.Coulson SE, O’Dwyer N,J, Adams RD, Croxson GR Expression of emotion and quality of life after facial nerve paralysis. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:1014–1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ryzenman JM, Pensak ML, Tew JM Jr. Facial paralysis and surgical rehabilitation: a quality of life analysis in a cohort of 1,595 patients after acoustic neuroma surgery. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:516–521; discussion 521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lassaletta L, Alfonso C, Del Rio, L., Roda JM, Gavilan J Impact of facial dysfunction on quality of life after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 2006;115:694–698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mehta RP, WernickRobinson M, Hadlock TA Validation of the Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire. Laryngoscope 2007;117:923–926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hadlock T, Cheney ML Facial reanimation: an invited review and commentary. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008;10:413–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mehta RP, Hadlock TA Botulinum toxin and quality of life in patients with facial paralysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008;10:84–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hadlock TA, Malo JS, Cheney ML, Henstrom DK Free gracilis transfer for smile in children: the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Experience in excursion and quality-of-life changes. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011;13:190–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Henstrom DK, Lindsay RW, Cheney ML, Hadlock TA Surgical treatment of the periocular complex and improvement of quality of life in patients with facial paralysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011;13:125–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ho AL, Scott AM, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Pusic AL, Van Laeken N Measuring quality of life and patient satisfaction in facial paralysis patients: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:91–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vakharia KT, Henstrom D, Plotkin SR, Cheney M, Hadlock TA Facial reanimation of patients with neurofibromatosis type 2. Neurosurgery 2012;70:237–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bhama P, Bhrany AD Ocular protection in facial paralysis. Curr 2013;21:353–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ng JH, Ngo RY The use of the facial clinimetric evaluation scale as a patient-based grading system in Bell’s palsy. Laryngoscope 2013;123:1256–1260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bhama PK, Park JG, Shanley K, Hadlock TA Refinements in nasolabial fold reconstruction for facial paralysis. Laryngoscope 2014;124:2687–2692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dey JK, Ishii LE, Byrne PJ, Boahene KD, Ishii M Seeing is believing: objectively evaluating the impact of facial reanimation surgery on social perception. Laryngoscope 2014;124:2489–2497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lindsay RW, Bhama P, Hadlock TA Quality-of-Life Improvement After Free Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Smile Restoration in Patients With Facial Paralysis. JAMA facial plastic surgery 2014;16:419–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lindsay RW, Bhama P, Hohman M, Hadlock TA Prospective Evaluation of Quality-of-Life Improvement After Correction of the Alar Base in the Flaccidly Paralyzed Face. JAMA facial plastic surgery 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Henstrom DK, Lindsay RW, Cheney ML, Hadlock TA Surgical treatment of the periocular complex and improvement of quality of life in patients with facial paralysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011;13:125–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Henstrom DK, Malo JS, Cheney ML, Hadlock TA Platysmectomy: an effective intervention for facial synkinesis and hypertonicity. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011;13:239–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Weir RF, Troyk PR, DeMichele GA, Kerns DA, Schorsch JF, Maas H Implantable myoelectric sensors (IMESs) for intramuscular electromyogram recording. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009;56:159–171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Merrill DR, Lockhart J, Troyk PR, Weir RF, Hankin DL Development of an implantable myoelectric sensor for advanced prosthesis control. Artif Organs 2011;35:249–252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Boyle R A Marine With A Prosthetic Hand Controlled By His Own Muscles. Popular Science 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Askin RE, Hiatt SD, Guillory KS, McDonnall D, Smith CF Systems and methods for flexible electrodes. Google Patents, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Strollo PJ Jr., Soose RJ, Maurer JT, et al. Upper-airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med 2014;370:139–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schwartz AR Hypoglossal nerve stimulation--optimizing its therapeutic potential in obstructive sleep apnea. J Neurol Sci 2014;346:1–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ring H, Treger I, Gruendlinger L, Hausdorff JM Neuroprosthesis for footdrop compared with an ankle-foot orthosis: effects on postural control during walking. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association 2009;18:41–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Meilahn JR Tolerability and effectiveness of a neuroprosthesis for the treatment of footdrop in pediatric patients with hemiparetic cerebral palsy. PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation 2013;5:503–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jowett N, Knox CJ, Hadlock T A Novel Approach To Synkinesis – Targeted Conduction Blockade Using High Frequency Alternating Current. Paper presented at: American Society for Peripheral Nerve Annual Meeting; January 16, 2016; Scottsdale, AZ. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bermejo R, Harvey M, Gao P, Zeigler HP Conditioned whisking in the rat. Somatosensory & motor research 1996;13:225–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bermejo R, Zeigler HP “Real-time” monitoring of vibrissa contacts during rodent whisking. Somatosensory & motor research 2000;17:373–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gao P, Bermejo R, Zeigler HP Whisker deafferentation and rodent whisking patterns: behavioral evidence for a central pattern generator. J Neurosci 2001;21:5374–5380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Harvey MA, Bermejo R, Zeigler HP Discriminative whisking in the head-fixed rat: optoelectronic monitoring during tactile detection and discrimination tasks. Somatosensory & motor research 2001;18:211–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bermejo R, Vyas A, Zeigler HP Topography of rodent whisking--I. Two-dimensional monitoring of whisker movements. Somatosensory & motor research 2002;19:341–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bermejo R, Szwed M, Friedman W, Ahissar E, Zeigler HP One whisker whisking: unit recording during conditioned whisking in rats. Somatosensory & motor research 2004;21:183–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Khatri V, Bermejo R, Brumberg JC, Zeigler HP Whisking in air: encoding of kinematics by VPM neurons in awake rats. Somatosensory & motor research 2010;27:111–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hadlock T, Lindsay R, Edwards C, et al. The effect of electrical and mechanical stimulation on the regenerating rodent facial nerve. Laryngoscope 2010;120:1094–1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Henstrom D, Hadlock T, Lindsay R, et al. The convergence of facial nerve branches providing whisker pad motor supply in rats: implications for facial reanimation study. Muscle & nerve 2012;45:692–697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Heaton JT, Knox CJ, Malo JS, Kobler JB, Hadlock TA A system for delivering mechanical stimulation and robot-assisted therapy to the rat whisker pad during facial nerve regeneration. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2013;21:928–937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Heaton JT, Sheu SH, Hohman MH, et al. Rat whisker movement after facial nerve lesion: evidence for autonomic contraction of skeletal muscle. Neuroscience 2014;265:9–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hill DN, Bermejo R, Zeigler HP, Kleinfeld D Biomechanics of the vibrissa motor plant in rat: rhythmic whisking consists of triphasic neuromuscular activity. J Neurosci 2008;28:3438–3455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Khatri V, Bermejo R, Brumberg JC, Keller A, Zeigler HP Whisking in air: encoding of kinematics by trigeminal ganglion neurons in awake rats. J Neurophysiol 2009;101:1836–1846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kleiss IJ, Knox CJ, Malo JS, Marres HA, Hadlock TA, Heaton JT Whisking recovery after automated mechanical stimulation during facial nerve regeneration. JAMA facial plastic surgery 2014;16:133–139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Vakharia KT, Lindsay RW, Knox C, et al. The effects of potential neuroprotective agents on rat facial function recovery following facial nerve injury. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;144:53–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hadlock TA, Kim SW, Weinberg JS, Knox CJ, Hohman MH, Heaton JT Quantitative analysis of muscle histologic method in rodent facial nerve injury. JAMA facial plastic surgery 2013;15:141–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Knox CJ, Hohman MH, Kleiss IJ, Weinberg JS, Heaton JT, Hadlock TA Facial nerve repair: fibrin adhesive coaptation versus epineurial suture repair in a rodent model. Laryngoscope 2013;123:1618–1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hohman MH, Kleiss IJ, Knox CJ, Weinberg JS, Heaton JT, Hadlock TA Functional recovery after facial nerve cable grafting in a rodent model. JAMA facial plastic surgery 2014;16:20–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Banks CA, Knox C, Hunter DA, Mackinnon SE, Hohman MH, Hadlock TA Long-Term Functional Recovery after Facial Nerve Transection and Repair in the Rat. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bermejo R, Friedman W, Zeigler HP Topography of whisking II: interaction of whisker and pad. Somatosensory & motor research 2005;22:213–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Thompson LT, Moyer JR Jr., Akase E, Disterhoft JF A system for quantitative analysis of associative learning. Part 1. Hardware interfaces with cross-species applications. Journal of neuroscience methods 1994;54:109–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jalaleddini K, Kearney RE Subspace identification of SISO Hammerstein systems: application to stretch reflex identification. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2013;60:2725–2734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jalaleddini K, Kearney RE Subspace method decomposition and identification of the parallel-cascade model of ankle joint stiffness: theory and simulation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2013;2013:5071–5074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hunter IW, Korenberg MJ The identification of nonlinear biological systems: Wiener and Hammerstein cascade models. Biol Cybern 1986;55:135–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Westwick DT, Kearney RE Models of Nonlinear Systems. Identification of Nonlinear Physiological Systems: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2005:57–101. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kurita M, Takushima A, Muraoka Y, Shiraishi T, Harii K Feasibility of bionic reanimation of a paralyzed face: a preliminary study of functional electrical stimulation of a paralyzed facial muscle controlled with the electromyography of the contralateral healthy hemiface. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:81e–83e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Frigerio A, Hadlock TA, Murray EH, Heaton JT Infrared-based blink-detecting glasses for facial pacing: toward a bionic blink. JAMA facial plastic surgery 2014;16:211–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Otto RA, Gaughan RN, Templer JW, Davis WE Electrical restoration of the blink reflex in experimentally induced facial paralysis. Ear Nose Throat J 1986;65:30–32, 37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rothstein J, Berlinger NT Electronic reanimation of facial paralysis--a feasibility study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;94:82–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Otto RA Restoration of function in the paralyzed rabbit orbicularis oculi muscle by direct functional electrical stimulation. Laryngoscope 1997;107:101–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Attiah MA, de Vries J, Richardson AG, Lucas TH A Rodent Model of Dynamic Facial Reanimation Using Functional Electrical Stimulation. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2017;11:193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Carvell GE, Simons DJ, Lichtenstein SH, Bryant P Electromyographic activity of mystacial pad musculature during whisking behavior in the rat. Somatosensory & motor research 1991;8:159–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zealear DL, Dedo HH Control of paralyzed axial muscles by electrical stimulation. Transactions Section on Otolaryngology American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology 1977;84:310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tobey DN, Sutton D Contralaterally elicited electrical stimulation of paralyzed facial muscles. Otolaryngology 1978;86:ORL-812–818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Broniatowski M, Ilyes LA, Jacobs GB, et al. Dynamic rehabilitation of the paralyzed face: I. Electronic control of reinnervated muscles from intact facial musculature in the rabbit. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;97:441–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Cao J, Lu B, Li L, Tong K, Wang W Implanted FNS system in closed-circle may become a way for the restoration of eye blinking and closing function for facial paralysis patient. Med Hypotheses 2008;70:1068–1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Mayr W, Hofer C, Bijak M, et al. Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) of denervated muscles: existing and prospective technological solutions. Basic Appl Myol 2002;12:287–290. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Salmons S, Ashley Z, Sutherland H, Russold MF, Li F, Jarvis JC Functional electrical stimulation of denervated muscles: basic issues. Artif Organs 2005;29:199–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Mortimer JT, Bhadra N Peripheral nerve and muscle stimulation. Neuroprosthetics: theory and practice Singapore: World Scientific Piblication Co Inc Editors: Horch KW and Dhillon GS 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hincapie JG, Kirsch RF Feasibility of EMG-Based Neural Network Controller for an Upper Extremity Neuroprosthesis. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2009;17:80–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kilgore KL, Hoyen HA, Bryden AM, Hart RL, Keith MW, Peckham PH An Implanted Upper-Extremity Neuroprosthesis Using Myoelectric Control. The Journal of hand surgery 2008;33:539–550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Du S, Tao Y, Martinez AM Compound facial expressions of emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2014;111:E1454–E1462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kim SW, Heller ES, Hohman MH, Hadlock TA, Heaton JT Detection and perceptual impact of side-to-side facial movement asymmetry. JAMA facial plastic surgery 2013;15:411–416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hohman MH, Kim SW, Heller ES, Frigerio A, Heaton JT, Hadlock TA Determining the threshold for asymmetry detection in facial expressions. Laryngoscope 2014;124:860–865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Franke M, Vrabec T, Wainright J, Bhadra N, Bhadra N, Kilgore K Combined KHFAC + DC nerve block without onset or reduced nerve conductivity after block. J Neural Eng 2014;11:056012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kilgore KL, Bhadra N Reversible nerve conduction block using kilohertz frequency alternating current. Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society 2014;17:242–254; discussion 254–245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ackermann DM Jr., Ethier C, Foldes EL, et al. Electrical conduction block in large nerves: high-frequency current delivery in the nonhuman primate. Muscle & nerve 2011;43:897–899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ackermann DM Jr., Bhadra N, Foldes EL, Kilgore KL Conduction block of whole nerve without onset firing using combined high frequency and direct current. Medical & biological engineering & computing 2011;49:241–251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kilgore KL, Foldes EA, Ackermann DM, Bhadra N Combined direct current and high frequency nerve block for elimination of the onset response. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009;2009:197–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bhadra N, Foldes EL, Ackermann D, Kilgore KL Reduction of the onset response in high frequency nerve block with amplitude ramps from non-zero amplitudes. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009;2009:650–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kilgore KL, Bhadra N High frequency mammalian nerve conduction block: simulations and experiments. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006;1:4971–4974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Bhadra N, Kilgore KL High-frequency nerve conduction block. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2004;7:4729–4732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Bhadra N, Lahowetz EA, Foldes ST, Kilgore KL Simulation of high-frequency sinusoidal electrical block of mammalian myelinated axons. Journal of computational neuroscience 2007;22:313–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Bhadra N, Bhadra N, Kilgore K, Gustafson KJ High frequency electrical conduction block of the pudendal nerve. J Neural Eng 2006;3:180–187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Bhadra N, Kilgore KL High-frequency electrical conduction block of mammalian peripheral motor nerve. Muscle & nerve 2005;32:782–790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Kilgore KL, Bhadra N Nerve conduction block utilising high-frequency alternating current. Medical & biological engineering & computing 2004;42:394–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Gerges M, Foldes EL, Ackermann DM, Bhadra N, Bhadra N, Kilgore KL Frequency- and amplitude-transitioned waveforms mitigate the onset response in high-frequency nerve block. J Neural Eng 2010;7:066003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Cuellar JM, Alataris K, Walker A, Yeomans DC, Antognini JF Effect of high-frequency alternating current on spinal afferent nociceptive transmission. Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society 2013;16:318–327; discussion 327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.














