Table 11.
Results of DNNs with AC, CT, LD and MCD feature descriptors on S. cerevisiae
| Model | Dimension | ACC | PE | RE | SPE | MCC | F 1 | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNNs-AC | (210+210) | 94.25% ± 0.22% | 94.70% ± 0.49% | 93.75% ± 0.26% | 94.74% ± 0.56% | 88.50% ± 0.45% | 94.22% ± 0.19% | 98.15% ± 0.08% |
| DNNs-CT | (343+343) | 94.37% ± 0.24% | 95.55% ± 0.75% | 93.09% ± 0.81% | 95.67% ± 0.65% | 88.78% ± 0.48% | 94.30% ± 0.23% | 98.20% ± 0.21% |
| DNNs-LD | (630+630) | 94.41% ± 0.14% | 95.46% ± 0.41% | 93.25% ± 0.44% | 95.56% ± 0.44% | 88.84% ± 0.28% | 94.34% ± 0.15% | 98.23% ± 0.06% |
| DNNs-MCD | (882+882) | 94.25% ± 0.22% | 94.70% ± 0.49% | 93.75% ± 0.26% | 94.74% ± 0.56% | 88.50% ± 0.45% | 94.22% ± 0.19% | 98.15% ± 0.08% |
∙/∘ indicates whether DNNs-AC is statistically (according to pairwise t-test at 95% significance level) superior/inferior to the other descriptors