Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 29.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Access. 2018 Nov 29;6:77796–77806. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2884126

TABLE 5:

Classifiers, features used, and performance statistics for best AUC of diagnostic experiment (experiment 1) using RIDER features

Experiment Features Set Classifier Feature Selector Features Selected Performanc Statistics
AUC
(95% CI)
Specificity
(95% CI)
Sensitivity
(95% CI)
Train C1T1 &
Test C2T2
Rider features Random Forests None All Rider Stable features 0.82
(0.79-0.85)
0.92
(0.88-0.96)
0.56
(0.46-0.65)
Train on C1T1 and C1 delta features &
Test on C2T2 and C2 delta features
(i.e., C2T2 - C2T1)
Rider features Random Forests None All Rider Stable features 0.858
(0.83-0.89)
0.94
(0.91-0.97)
0.65
(0.56-0.74)
p value (p <0.05) 0.381