Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 31;13(12):e0209932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209932

Table 3. Effects of treatment delay on disease infectivity, severity, and treatment efficacy.

Treatment Delay Lung Cavitation
n (%)
RR
(95% CI)
Smear Grade *
n (%)
RR
(95% CI)
Resistance Pattern *
n (%)
RR
(95% CI)
Culture Conversion *
n (%)
RR
(95% CI)
Present Absent High Low > HR HR Long Short
Long 14 156 1.46 96 74 1.41 26 144 3.06 89 42 1.49
(8.2) (91.8) (0.65–3.29) (56.5) (43.5) (1.12–1.78) (15.3) (84.7) (1.43–6.56) (67.9) (32.1) (1.19–1.85)
Short 9 151 1.00 64 96 1.00 8 152 1.00 63 75 1.00
(5.6) (94.4) (40.0) (60.0) (5.0) (95.0) (45.7) (54.3)
Total 23 307 160 170 34 296 152 117
(7.0) (93.0) (48.5) (51.5) (10.3) (89.7) (56.5) (43.5)

Resistance pattern was categorized as HR (resistance to isoniazid and rifampicin only) and > HR (resistance to SHR and SHRE). Treatment delay was categorized as short delay (< 105 days) and long delay (≥ 105 days). Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio.

p value 0.39,

* p value < 0.05 Significant