Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 31;13(12):e0210063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210063

Table 5. Factors associated with preference for lay provider HIV testing.

Factors Univariate regression Multivariate regression
Odds ratio
(95% CI)
p value Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) p value
Key population group
    SP & GP Ref Ref
    MSM 2.63 (1.71–4.03) 0.000*** 1.58 (0.79–3.2) 0.197
    FSW 0.86 (0.45–1.63) 0.654 1.12 (0.54–2.33) 0.760
    PWID 0.80 (0.53–1.20) 0.282 0.68 (0.44–1.05) 0.080
Residence
    Rural Ref Ref
    Urban 2.50 (1.79–3.48) 0.000*** 2.50 (1.30–4.90) 0.006**
Age (years)
    18 to 24 Ref Ref
    Older than 24 0.64 (0.46–0.91) 0.013* 1.28 (0.83–1.99) 0.258
Education
    High school or lower Ref Ref
    University or higher 2.48 (1.66–3.69) 0.000*** 1.83 (1.05–3.20) 0.034*
Income (per month)
(mean: VND3,832,965 or US$170)
    Less than mean Ref Ref
    Equal to or greater than mean 1.16 (0.84–1.60) 0.362 0.79 (0.54–1.19) 0.265
Occupation
    Farmer Ref Ref
    Small business/entertainment 1.11 (0.71–1.73) 0.625 0.23 (0.10–0.46) 0.000***
    Student 3.03 (1.59–5.79) 0.001** 0.40 (0.15–1.06) 0.066
    Freelance 1.24 (0.81–1.90) 0.301 0.57 (0.33–0.98) 0.044*
    Other 1.33 (0.75–2.34) 0.325 0.34 (0.16–0.72) 0.005
Ethnic group
    Other minorities Ref Ref
    Kinh majority 1.88 (1.36–2.60) 0.000*** 1.28 (0.74–2.2) 0.376
Marital status
    Single Ref Ref
    Currently married 0.50 (0.35–0.70) 0.000*** 0.89 (0.55–1.46) 0.659
    Cohabitating with partner 0.78 (0.29–2.06) 0.619 0.99 (0.35–2.76) 0.993
    Previously married 0.44 (0.24–0.80) 0.007** 0.73 (0.37–1.460) 0.376

ᵟOther minorities include Thai, H’Mong, Kho Mu, Hoa, and Khmer. Logistic regression

*p <0.05

**p <0.01

***p <0.001.

CI, confidence interval; FSW, female sex workers; GP, general population; MSM, men who have sex with men; PWID, people who inject drugs; Ref, reference; SP, sexual partners; VND, Vietnamese Dong.