Table 4. Fixed effect regression models for adjusted associations between homicide rates and BFP coverage in the Brazilian municipalities by gender, 2004–2012.
Variable | Male analysis model | Female analysis model | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RR | (95% CI) | RR | (95% CI) | |
BFP coverage 0–30% | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
BFP coverage >30–70% | 0.837 | (0.790–0.888) | 0.804 | (0.723–0.894) |
BFP coverage >70% | 0.770 | (0.726–0.818) | 0.730 | (0.655–0.813) |
% of inhabitants receiving BFP benefit | 1.008 | (1.007–1.009) | 1.013 | (1.010–1.016) |
Per capita income BR$ (monthly) | 0.938 | (0.924–0.952) | 1.001 | (1.000–1.001) |
% unemployed people | 0.986 | (0.981–0.991) | 1.021 | (1.008–1.034) |
Policing rate | 1.000 | (1.000–1.000) | 1.000 | (1.000–1.000) |
Guns availability | 1.000 | (1.000–1.001) | 1.003 | (1.002–1.004) |
% of people with low education level | 1.040 | (1.035–1.044) | 0.997 | (0.986–1.007) |
Urbanization rate | 0.995 | (0.992–0.997) | 1.001 | (0.996–1.007) |
Time (year) | 1.094 | (1.085–1.103) | 0.998 | (0.976–1.020) |
Number of observations | 46890 | 33921 | ||
Number of municipalities | 5210 | 3769 | ||
Number of homicides | 338776 | 35871 |
Abbreviations: CI = Confidence Interval; RR = Rate Ratio.